Such a complicated poll, I guess you can all throw things at me for reminding about it 
|
RBP2 (Realms Beyond Pitboss) Planning Thread
|
|
Speaker and I are both aware that the "No Espionage" option is unfortunately broken in its implementation, and no, we're not voting for that. But you can put us down for whatever the minimum possible vote for Espionage turns out to be (No Spies?)
I also think that this is getting unnecessarily complicated... Espionage is a pretty minor part of the game, in all honesty.
October 19th, 2009, 12:33
(This post was last modified: October 19th, 2009, 13:24 by sunrise089.)
Since Athlete may be waiting for the Espionage question to be resolved before picking his civ or leader, how about we say the plurality wins as of midnight EST tonight? Feel free to change your votes around until then as needed. I'll try to note people's order of preferences when I've seen them.
Athlete - No restrictions Broker33 + Plako - No restrictions Jowy + Yazilliclick - No spies DMOC + Nakor - No restrictions Iamjohn + Kodii - No spies Speaker + Sullla - Least espionage other than none Mortius - Anything other than No Espionage Danski - No espionage -> No restrictions LiPing - Passive only/No spies Regoarrarr + darrelljs + sunrise089 I think that provisionally makes: *No Restrictions - 3 *Specific missions banned - *No spies - 4 *Espionage turned off - 1
Just wanted to wish you all good luck.
I debated for quite some time if to join this and I am still undecided. Would anybody take me? Not sure I can join but I would like to know if the option is there, that is if a team would need an extra person. I would in any case lurk and comment on this game. Kalin LiPing Wrote:In that case, Passive seems hugely unpopular, so I'll give the other 1/2 to no spies also where it might actually be useful Oh no! Now that you did that it made No Spies and No Restrictions tie, making Mortius' vote not get applied 
|
