If I'm green enough for you, I'll sign up.
PBEM53 Settings & Discussion thread
|
Would love to have you azza.
I'll pay you back for capturing the Protoss homeworld Aiur in PBEM46 mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
I'll sign up too.
I like the points system for leader selection, with points set by the mapmaker. Alternatively, random pairings, with top/bottom purged by lurkers also sounds good.
Do we want to start discussing options now that we have 4 players, or do you guys want to wait for a possible 5th player.
http://nijidraws.tumblr.com/ - Crediting the artist who made my profile pic.
edit: My friend will not be joining us for the game - let's get the discussion around game settings and map happening
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
regarding options, I like the leader/civ point system too, but I wouldn't presume to be able to accurately change the values of different civs based on a map - that would be something that Commodore and Sian should do when they make the map.
my thoughts regarding map - I like the idea of an archipelago-type map with four main continents surrounded by interconnecting islands. I dunno, I like naval maps. mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
If I were to get a naval map, I would think the map used for Pitboss 2 would be pref by me.
http://nijidraws.tumblr.com/ - Crediting the artist who made my profile pic.
it would have to be remade to suit the smaller player count, but i like the overall layout and it would be fun to recreate
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
generic settings, non map related
- Spies banned - Nukes banned - Blockades banned - War Elephants banned - point system for civ picks - Quick Speed - Ancient - Huts, vassals, events and barbarians off anything else? mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM? |