October 21st, 2013, 21:44
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Did Pindicator add and drop every other Giants RB?
Hillis would have given him some points, not that it would have mattered.
October 21st, 2013, 21:53
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Let's spin the WHEEEEEEEEEEEL OF WEEEEEEEEEEEALTH!
October 21st, 2013, 22:11
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
My god, the Special Teams this game...
October 21st, 2013, 22:19
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
"This is a game the Vikings could have won if they were at all capable on offense."
Announcers being harsh tonight.
October 21st, 2013, 23:35
Posts: 17,546
Threads: 79
Joined: Nov 2005
(October 21st, 2013, 21:44)Kuro Wrote: Did Pindicator add and drop every other Giants RB?
Hillis would have given him some points, not that it would have mattered.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df58/3df5857df63f2158f60fda5c2886035be69e594b" alt="lol lol" pretty much.
I started second guessing Cox, and then second guessing Hillis, and finally threw my arms up in the air and said 'screw it'
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
October 22nd, 2013, 00:11
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Did Bruce and Cyneheard manage to get a tie? I hope stat corrections don't knock it off being a tie. I love seeing fantasy ties.
October 22nd, 2013, 07:00
Posts: 5,641
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
(October 22nd, 2013, 00:11)Kuro Wrote: Did Bruce and Cyneheard manage to get a tie? I hope stat corrections don't knock it off being a tie. I love seeing fantasy ties.
As of this morning, I'm 4-3. They added 2 points to the Vikings D.
October 22nd, 2013, 07:06
Posts: 3,924
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
(October 22nd, 2013, 07:00)Cyneheard Wrote: (October 22nd, 2013, 00:11)Kuro Wrote: Did Bruce and Cyneheard manage to get a tie? I hope stat corrections don't knock it off being a tie. I love seeing fantasy ties.
As of this morning, I'm 4-3. They added 2 points to the Vikings D.
Aaaaaaaw.
October 22nd, 2013, 08:54
(This post was last modified: October 22nd, 2013, 08:55 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,387
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
(October 21st, 2013, 23:35)pindicator Wrote: (October 21st, 2013, 21:44)Kuro Wrote: Did Pindicator add and drop every other Giants RB?
Hillis would have given him some points, not that it would have mattered.
pretty much.
I started second guessing Cox, and then second guessing Hillis, and finally threw my arms up in the air and said 'screw it'
It's kinda hilarious to me to see Cox scheduled to start for the Giants after he couldn't crack the starting lineup in 4 years at Michigan.
October 22nd, 2013, 13:28
Posts: 15,387
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
So I had a couple people ask about us using decimal scoring. I don't usually like changing rules mid-season, but if we have basically unanimous support, we can actually change it. It's very easy to switch our league scoring to decimals - just a matter of flipping a setting. Also, only rushing, receiving, and passing yards are impacted by the change. So for example, 33 yards becomes 3.3 points, not 3 points. Nothing else changes.
One issue. Changing the scoring system is retroactive. So in theory, some results from some close games this year could change. I really don't know if they would or not, but it's possible, which makes a change a no-go IMO. However, if results don't change, I don't see a lot of downside in making a swap. So here's our options if we want to discuss it:
1) Turn decimal scoring on. If it changes an outcome, switch back to non-decimal and carry on.
2) Leave it be.
I'm actually up for giving #1 a shot and seeing if the outcomes change, but I'm also against any midseason changes that don't have virtually unanimous support. So I'll open it up to discussion I guess.
|