Login

Qgqqqqq

Well this looks like a fun team, should have some good discussion.
I think our strongest point needs to be our ability to communicate with each other - as PB4's team 4 showed, we really need to make sure we function as one coherent whole, which means good communication and endless discussion smile

To kick it off, I think we should aim for the [REDACTED], as they have good synergy with our teams skillsets, paticularly if we can leverage the [REDACTED] for an [REDACTED]-game lead. We should make sure to follow [REDACTED]'s example from PBEM [REDACTED], paticularly the bit where [HE/SHE/IT] took advantage of the [REDACTED] to perform that best of strategies,

First things first, anyone is welcome in this thread! Lurkers, opponents - even mapmakers! (Okay the team-mates can read along too alright

), but only lurkers should open the spoilers (which should be largely serious from hereon in).

By the way, for whoever rolls the start/civilizations (Merovech?) those should be spoilered too. Later players should have NO IDEA what is going on!
Yeah, this game is gonna be ridiculous popcorn

Edit: For those viewing this later, the lack of images is because dropbox changed their functionality. This is a common problem across the fora.

Nicolae Carpathia · October 28th, 2013, 18:10

Okay, so who goes first then?

Courtesy of random.org:
DaveV
NC
Qg

DaveV · October 28th, 2013, 18:21

Ten turns per player? I think there'll be plenty of randomness without adding the confusion of variable shifts.

Nicolae Carpathia · October 28th, 2013, 18:46

I like 10 turns/player, it's so much easier that way. The less rolling we need to do as a team, the better.

If you want to say roll what you want to build, or what languages you want to put your google translate through, that's your decision!

Qgqqqqq · October 28th, 2013, 22:03

Yeah I'm up for 10 turns a player, helps to reduce mistakes/missing turns. That setup looks fine too (do we want to do 10 or 20 turns for the initial set?).