Honest question , old Harry why me 
? , also if I have an ability am I allowed to use it? Or will I get lynched for it tomorrow ?
? , also if I have an ability am I allowed to use it? Or will I get lynched for it tomorrow ?
![[Image: CmQTvVS.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/CmQTvVS.jpg)
| Poll: How surprised are you to see a poll up again? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Not very. | 2 | 15.38% | |
| Exceedingly! | 2 | 15.38% | |
| You're a damn commie trying to sabotage the thread again aren't you? | 9 | 69.23% | |
| Total | 13 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
WW 31 Game Thread PARANOIA
|
|
Lewwyn pointed it already out, but for emphasis, I did vote for Q at the end, not Bob. I'd really prefer the tallies to be checked instead of just hoping that a tool is doing it correctly.
 Also, well done guys. novice might be correct however and we did indeed have two wolves tied on D1. Yes, very unlikely but not unheard of. I also would give the ones voting Azza a town-lean, but given the possibility of two wolves being tied I think stating that all of them have to be outright village seems to far-fetched at this point. That said, except for zak (who simply was to quiet imo to build an opinion on) I would lean heavily towards town regarding the other votes. Yes, even Bob, despite me still not liking that he never answered nor explained the post I pointed out.
(January 18th, 2014, 19:01)Serdoa Wrote:Both votes so far have apparently been in response to the text 'I hate parrots', and given Azarius' attempt appears to have failed, novice seems the source.(January 18th, 2014, 18:59)sunrise089 Wrote: Does the robot's new vote tell us anything?Yes, that it can vote for the leading candidate and has no time restrictions on its vote. They also appear to be proceeding in alphabetical order. Definitely further testing required here though. (January 18th, 2014, 18:58)Azarius Wrote:Excuse me! I was acting in good faith, assuming that since I had assisted novice in ensuring that all red-appearing votes would actually be counted the last time I played, the updates to prevent such exploitation would have been kept for any new iterations of the script.(January 18th, 2014, 18:55)Serdoa Wrote: Your vote count misses Mattimeos vote I think.He must be trolling mafiahelper again. (January 18th, 2014, 18:15)Old Harry Wrote: Except if the team leader is a wolf, then they win the 1 vs 1. There's only about a 1/4 chance that Matt is a wolf, but they can keep killing the team leader until they get their man/beast into power.No, seriously, did people not read the post where the Mandatory Bonus Roles were initially introduced? (January 16th, 2014, 18:08)BRickAstley Wrote: This game will also have Mandatory Bonus Duties. These are roles that are public in who has them and what they do. These roles will be passed to a new player in a set and hidden order, if the previous player possessing them is eliminated. There is also a set time that each of these roles will be removed from the game as the game goes on.This exactly mirrors a previous (BRick?) game where the mayor lost their bonus weight once there were 7 people left *specifically to avoid it causing problems in the extreme end game* (January 18th, 2014, 19:51)Old Harry Wrote:ah. My bad.(January 18th, 2014, 19:46)Mattimeo Wrote: Loyalty Officer: -- Don’t forget.
Always, somewhere, someone is fighting for you. -- As long as you remember her, you are not alone.
Good job guys. I'm really surprised it went down like this, I was sure that we'd go back to lynching newbies and lynch baits in a bigger game.
Some other things we seem to have forgotten Already a few people saying that the ones who voted for Azza are now cleared. I used to be naive like that, then I played mafia. I've been playing since WW25, and scum have sacrificed scum in the following games since I started playing: WW26, WW27, WW28, WW29. It'd surprise me more if there actually weren't any scum on Azza.
For the record, here's the correct day 1 tally:
6 votes: Azza (Bobchillingworth, MJW (ya that one), Rowain, zakalwe, Imana-665-C, Lewwyn) 5 votes: Qgqqqqq (novice, Gazglum, Azarius, Serdoa, Old Harry) 3 votes: catwalk (Ichabod, Qgqqqqq, spacetyrantxenu) 2 votes: MJW (sunrise089, Azza) 1.23 votes: Bobchillingworth (Mattimeo) 1 votes: sunrise089 (Merovech) 1 votes: Old Harry (Catwalk) 1 votes: zakalwe (Jowy) 1 votes: [No Vote] (Ryan) Voting history:
I have to run.
(January 19th, 2014, 09:21)Catwalk Wrote: Jowy, did the scum faction make a sacrifice on day 1 in either of those? Good job on the lynch, and GG Azza. Two on D1, one on D2, one on D5. And that's just the scum who died Anyway it's just to illustrate the point that we shouldn't clear anyone just off the back of this. It's really no big deal for scum to sacrifice one of their own if one of their own gets in trouble. They're not worth saving, and in fact the scum could actually gain more than they lose if they get a good cover out of it. We've seen scum here in RB voting for each other and sacrificing each other nearly every game, if not in all of them. It'd simply be wrong to clear them. That said, we do have plenty of other targets so we can and likely will lynch non-Azza voters next, but I'd rather speak up now and correct the errors we're making than stay silent and get killed before I have a chance. I'm sure many of you agree with this thinking.If you read between the lines, you noticed that I don't believe the bandwagon on Q was an attempt to save Azza. It's just too obvious and risky. There could be scum in there, or there might be none, but there's no way they just put all their eggs in that basket on D1.
I find it interesting to see how the Qgqqqqq wagon started to roll as soon Azza took the lead but didn't move an inch when I was voting him previously.
For me Gazglum, Serdoa and Old Harry (the last 3 Qg voters) have to really show their villagerness tomorrow. And we should lynch one of those 3. It also makes clear that a talking about 2 scum up there is a bit strange. Serdoas theory that Imana is scum-directed is looking wrong. |
