(January 20th, 2014, 16:09)Merovech Wrote: Why would you ask this?
Because it sounded like you were just using made up numbers and posting to appear to be saying something.
After my posts right before that? I don't like this logic. It seems to me like you were role-fishing.
You said pretty explicitly in your post that it would have nothing to do with your role. I was trying to see if you had something you were actually basing your statement off of.
(January 20th, 2014, 16:30)Azarius Wrote: Rowain, I think I covered most of your points in my response to Serdoa other than Old Harry. I was reluctant to vote for him day 1 because I would prefer not to lynch a new player on day 1 unless it's very obvious. As for today, I can only vote for one person at a time, and I prefer to be slightly less manic with my votes than say bob.
Yesterday Gazglum was your Nr1 lynch and then you ended up voting with him on Qg today you are a pair on Serdoa. And you use the fact that Gaz was voting with you (when the other on the block was a powerwolf) as villagetell but call Serdoa who voted for the same target scum?
Harry Wrote:My reading is mostly based on tone, he hasn't done anything that sticks out to me as village, but I struggle to critisise anything past his argument with Catwalk. I think other people have said more scummy things now though, so it depends who else is up for the lynch. I could be getting influenced by others reading his WW27 style. Let's say I have a scum lean for now.
Would you care to elaborate? Presumably these are things yhat have been said over the past day so I'm unsure why you wouldn't point them out.
Well there was the mess with Ryan and Lewwyn going on at the time except that they've both looked more villagery in the aftermath, I don't like Jowy asking everyone to stop revealing and then asking Lewwyn for more info and I don't like how everyone seems to be voting for me.
What's bothering me most is the number of people I don't have a gut feel for either way:
- Ichabod - he gets credit for pegging my stuff as nooby but his criticism of Serdoa is "there were some good points against him by other players, though I don't remember exactly what they were"
- Matt - just correcting things people didn't understand from the rules, not much else except that his vote on Bob seemed to miss that Bob had already mentioned wolves could attack themselves
- Mero - Canadian, but getting better
- Novice - Saying "This is not good" eight minutes before Azza was lynched must have been what led to Gaz, Serdoa and me piling on, so that makes it his fault
- Serdoa - as bad at voting as me so far, with so much time spent defending something that wasn't even an attack on him, I think maybe he protests too much?
- Xenu - barely here
- Sunrise - keeping his head down except for tagging the top candidate (Hi!), he hasn't risked a vote yet today
Speaking of which I'm not voting Lewwyn today and I don't want to turn Sunrise's attention into a vote so I'll have to vote for one of my colleagues at the end of the Q bandwagon, which is going to be [applies padding] Serdoa. [Hides]
I don't think that voting for Lewwyn is helpful today. Please at least wait until the start of Day 3. See my earlier posts from today for detailed reasoning.
If a significant number of people think Lewwyn might be a SK or something, then I could lock him down using my Hygiene Officer power.
Because id rather vote on more solid of an evidence then all this random chaos happening atm. Everyone is voting someone random in my eyes. Theres a killing role alive atm. If hes a vigi. It takes two shots to kill someone. He isnt killing anyone. If hes scum or sk which is more likely we gain from this. If hes scum, he could have an ability different from his faction ability , that he can use tonight that will endanger us. I'd rather take a confirmed killer out than anyone else. Anyone not voting for him and choosing to go for random accusation... is wasting our time.
Moving back to Gazglum, Ryan was for emphasis- although I'm definitely not convinced he's clean either. Actually the situation kind of gives me a headache.
(January 20th, 2014, 16:09)Merovech Wrote: Why would you ask this?
Because it sounded like you were just using made up numbers and posting to appear to be saying something.
After my posts right before that? I don't like this logic. It seems to me like you were role-fishing.
You said pretty explicitly in your post that it would have nothing to do with your role. I was trying to see if you had something you were actually basing your statement off of.
Oh. Okay, cool. Uh, well, I don't know how to respond to this, to tell the truth.
Merovech's Mapmaking Guidelines:
0. Player Requests: The player's requests take precedence, even if they contradict the following guidelines.
1. Balance: The map must be balanced, both in regards to land quality and availability and in regards to special civilization features. A map may be wonderfully unique and surprising, but, if it is unbalanced, the game will suffer and the player's enjoyment will not be as high as it could be.
2. Identity and Enjoyment: The map should be interesting to play at all levels, from city placement and management to the border-created interactions between civilizations, and should include varied terrain. Flavor should enhance the inherent pleasure resulting from the underlying tile arrangements. The map should not be exceedingly lush, but it is better to err on the lush side than on the poor side when placing terrain.
3. Feel (Avoiding Gimmicks): The map should not be overwhelmed or dominated by the mapmaker's flavor. Embellishment of the map through the use of special improvements, barbarian units, and abnormal terrain can enhance the identity and enjoyment of the map, but should take a backseat to the more normal aspects of the map. The game should usually not revolve around the flavor, but merely be accented by it.
4. Realism: Where possible, the terrain of the map should be realistic. Jungles on desert tiles, or even next to desert tiles, should therefore have a very specific reason for existing. Rivers should run downhill or across level ground into bodies of water. Irrigated terrain should have a higher grassland to plains ratio than dry terrain. Mountain chains should cast rain shadows. Islands, mountains, and peninsulas should follow logical plate tectonics.
(January 20th, 2014, 14:18)Bobchillingworth Wrote: If you want a better target, try Gazglum, who voted for Qg for no reason close to the lynch deadline, and then tried to excuse it at the end of Night 1 by telling Qg that he had apparently always suspected Azza- despite not having voted for him with any frequency.
Given how it turned out, it’s fair enough that I get my turn under the interrogation lamp. But I didn’t say I had always suspected Azza. I didn’t pay his case much attention earlier in the first session, he only had 2 votes I think. When I woke up a few hours before lynch I again tried to push Zak, but said I would move my vote to a meaningful candidate at the end and that I didn’t like the MJW case.
I skimmed over Catwalk’s stuff, but didn’t see much there that I found suspicious. So as deadline approached it was Azza (4) Q (2), and so I had to focus on those cases (I discounted MJW and Catwalk).
Serdoa and Lewwyn(?) had made some good points about Azza’s tunnelling on MJW, but I didn’t trust Zak’s jump to him and Q was Wall-Of-Texting like his last scum game. I wasn’t sold on either of them, so I thought we might learn more from keeping the vote close than from stitching up Azza to 5 votes, when I wasn’t convinced of his guilt.
(January 20th, 2014, 16:30)Azarius Wrote: Rowain, I think I covered most of your points in my response to Serdoa other than Old Harry. I was reluctant to vote for him day 1 because I would prefer not to lynch a new player on day 1 unless it's very obvious. As for today, I can only vote for one person at a time, and I prefer to be slightly less manic with my votes than say bob.
Yesterday Gazglum was your Nr1 lynch and then you ended up voting with him on Qg today you are a pair on Serdoa. And you use the fact that Gaz was voting with you (when the other on the block was a powerwolf) as villagetell but call Serdoa who voted for the same target scum?
What do you think about Gazglum today?
I said it made me feel better about him, as in I suspect him less, not that it makes him village. I was inclined to follow you onto Gazglum, especially since we'd have company there, but I can't help but wonder why you seem to want to pull a vote off of Serdoa when you've spent so much time questioning him.
![[Image: CmQTvVS.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/CmQTvVS.jpg)
