WW 31 Game Thread PARANOIA

[Catwalk]

That much I agree on, but is he a lying communist? Lynching a serial killer eliminates a night kill, but that kill may as well hit a communist or another 3rd party player. It's an okay compromise if we have nothing better, I don't feel it's the best option.

[Jowy]

Surely it can be changed though. Maybe we should have Bob scrub Gazglum and then lynch Bob anyway.

I don't know actually. The way he was acting yesterday, saving it until the very end and wanting to discuss it through before doing anything, I figured it's just locked in once it's been used. But you are right, doesn't really say in the rules whether you can change it like a vote. Also he said "done" to MJW, not something like "I will", so I think he at least believed it to be locked in on the first time.

[Jowy]

[novice]

[Mattimeo]

Surely it can be changed though. Maybe we should have Bob scrub Gazglum and then lynch Bob anyway.

Why? SK is basically town until the wolves aren't a threat any more. *Especially* when there are enough vigs around that they can blend in.

Catwalk, lynching the serial killer eliminates a night kill though. Lynching a communist does not.

Eliminates a night kill that has a 1/4 or 1/5 chance of hitting scum, and is likely to be aiming scum.
Not sure why that's something we're wanting to do 'til more scum are dead and the functionally-identical-to-an-extra-vig-shot is less valuable than the fact we can't win 'til he's dead.

[Serdoa]

Surely it can be changed though. Maybe we should have Bob scrub Gazglum and then lynch Bob anyway.

Yeah, because if it can be changed (necessary for your idea) there are two possibilities:

1) Bob is village. In that case, why lynch him in the first place?
2) Bob is not village. Why should he not change it in the last minute, just to screw us over?

That's another not thought through idea novice and I'm really not getting why you bring up those. The same goes for your post questioning catwalk. You don't bring arguments why to trust you or give credit to your ideas, you just try to "scare" players into following you. At least those you know are liable to let them affect them. The others you just try to paint as scum.

[Ryan]

Just for my understanding. If we have a very likely sk. We shouldnt lynch him. Attempt to lynch a communist that we are not sure off and might misslynch a townie... how does that make any sense.

[Ryan]

Those arguments are just... insane. The only one benefiting from this are scum and the actual maybe SK

[novice]

Just thinking out loud there for a moment, Serdoa. I guess I'll stop doing that.

I get the impression you find it scummy that I propose something predicated on Bob being allowed to change his order. Why? I don't think you're one to talk about painting people as scum. That's what your response has been all day today when I've tried to get Rowain to fess up.

[Serdoa]

novice, I find it scummy that you propose something that makes no sense. I'd understand if it would be something hard to grasp, some rule-stuff like the issues that were pointed out with zaks "plan". But it is not, it is very easy to see and I don't believe that you didn't realize it while writing it down.

And btw: I'm not sold on Bob being a villager. Though if I have to decide between Bob and Gazglum, I sure as heck will vote Gazglum. Because I know that Gazglum killed a villager (me) and at least you all know that Gazglum did kill.