WW 31 Game Thread PARANOIA

[Ichabod]

spacetyrantxenu

[Ichabod]

Hey, Ryan, scan sunrise tonight? How about that?

[Ichabod]

Serdoa why not bob?

I'd be willing to vote bob too.

[Ryan]

Ichabod, I wont reveal who I am scanning. This is role madness :P I dunno what kind of roles are there that can affect mine. I am willing to go for bob over anyone else. also mind the fact that you are a potential scum scan target. I don't fully trust you.

[Ryan]

Bobchillingworth

[Bobchillingworth]

Why in the heck are people voting for Ryan? I don't like his posts, I don't like his arguments, but his power is undeniably extremely useful.


So many people have claimed weak or outright terrible roles in this game that we can't use that alone for a determination of guilt or innocence. It is kind though of Friend Computer to allow the weak and enfeebled to participate in the hunt for scum


I haven't decided yet if I'm going to shoot anyone tonight- TBH I'm not sure who I would even target. Probably best to stay my fire.


Azarius, do you want me to scrub you tonight, so that you aren't forced to attack someone?

[Serdoa]

Overview of night-kills for those that try to follow Jowys post (is good, do it):

N1: Lewwyn, Ryan unclaimed
N2: Serdoa (Gazglum), Q (Azarius), MJW
N3: novice, zakalwe, MJW

First: N1 we had 2 kills and the claimed-vigs all stated they had nothing to do with it. I'll for the moment assume that's the truth. Therefore scum has 2 kills (one faction with 2 or two factions each 1).

Second: If we believe that the kill on novice was done by MJW (I can agree with that Jowy), than there is only one night that did not have 2 scum-kills, that's night 2 when novice was scrubbed.

Third: Ryan states that novice is not a killer. But Jowy, I think you forgot one point here: We do have a role-blocker as Gazglums kill on Old Harry did not go through.

Therefore I think we have a possibility here being that scum blocked Ryan on N3. If he scanned a villager that could kill (unlikely we asked all to claim) it would only be obvious that he was blocked if that villager would come clean. More likely he would scan a villager that can't kill, no harm done. Or a scum that can kill, giving that scum an alibi.

novice

while I reread how that exchange today was going.

[Serdoa]

Also catwalk, I think you've never answered the question if your role does indeed also tell you if your target actually visited you or not. If I missed it, sorry, please point me to it or else please answer it

And the re-read of the start of this day was very quick. Not really much to see there. novice did post shortly after I questioned Ryan we he doesn't tell us whom he scanned but did not comment on that at all (what I would say is unusual for him imo) and as soon as Ryan revealed that he had scanned novice and got a negative result novice voted Rowain.

[Jowy]

Serdoa, are you saying that if Ryan gets roleblocked, he gets a negative result instead of "no result"? Is that how it works normally?

[Ryan]

Serdoa again, why not go for bob. Why is he not a prio over Novice. He is an actual role that is a confirmed killer. Novice could be scum IF I WAS BLOCKED. He should be a prio since I had an actual result on him and to be honest, I just cant believe we have that many killers and I am supposed to be the only seer. Unless Brick is aiming for more discussion then seer WW. Which I dont mind..