As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer

Create an account  

 
Pitboss 18 Organizing Thread (RB Mod 34 Civs)

(February 13th, 2014, 01:01)plako Wrote:
(February 12th, 2014, 22:00)sunrise089 Wrote: I'll team with Darrell if we nix the mod idea smile

You need some kind of mod to get more than 18 teams.

Touche.

Perhaps RB mod can be altered to remove everything that makes it RB mod, but keeping the ability to run > 18 civs smile
Reply

I don't think Krill had a OCC in mind when he floated the idea.

And I likewise agree that putting all the talent on one team wouldn't be fun for most of the others. Did anyone read PB12? I didn't. I saw the roster and saw no need to lurk further.

Played: Pitboss 18 - Kublai Khan of Germany Somalia | Pitboss 11 - De Gaulle of Byzantium | Pitboss 8 - Churchill of Portugal | PB7 - Mao of Native America | PBEM29 Greens - Mao of Babylon
Reply

So, where's the enthusiasm for this after ~48 hours?
Reply

(February 14th, 2014, 09:31)Boldly Going Nowhere Wrote: So, where's the enthusiasm for this after ~48 hours?

You'll need a mod to break the player limit and a definite setup with sign ups.
Reply

(February 14th, 2014, 09:31)Boldly Going Nowhere Wrote: So, where's the enthusiasm for this after ~48 hours?

I really want this to happen, though I don't think we need any of the wacky variants. ~34 (come on, lets get 34, ALL OF THE CIVS) is wacky variant enough.
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Reply

I agree with dtay smile
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

Well, what defines wacky? How tight of a map do people prefer? Also, would you rather play with or without the RB mod?
Reply

(February 14th, 2014, 11:02)Catwalk Wrote: Well, what defines wacky? How tight of a map do people prefer? Also, would you rather play with or without the RB mod?

No matter what you think of the thematic changes in RBMod, the civs and leaders are much more balanced for a game like this or else you still give a massive advantage to India / Inca / Pacal / Willem.
Reply

That is a good point.
Reply

so, if you guys really want this to happen, setup decisions need to be made early. just discussing it is not likely to find a consensus for 20+ players, someone needs to get a settings ballot posted.
Reply



Forum Jump: