(June 1st, 2014, 16:14)Hashoosh Wrote: reactionary arguments
Not sure what this means... I'm arguing who is likely scum, who is likely innocent, and why I am innocent. What more do you want me to do?
If you know what I mean.
|
WW33 - Walking Dead [GAME THREAD]
|
|
By the way, I certainly didn't push Rowain and Azarius into vitriolic debate. I don't think anyone did that, really, at least as I can recall. Some were more willing than others to entertain the idea that Azarius was scum, but that's not the same thing, at all.
I guess you might accuse Jabbz of fanning that fire, but he mostly started raging after Azarius was lynched. I do have one question for Jabbz. If you were so set on saving Azarius, why did you vote for Rowain. I had stated very explicitly that I would be voting for Azarius over Rowain, if it came to that, so your vote for Rowain was rather sealing his fate, than giving him a chance to survive.
If you know what I mean.
zak Wrote:Like I mentioned yesterday, this looks odd. In fact, it looks like Hashoosh threw a distancing jab at Goreripper, who decided to just ignore it, since things were going well. Then Hashoosh didn't want to press his luck, either, so he never followed up on it. Or just plain forgot about it, since it wasn't a question that he actually wanted an answer to. In short, Goreripper didn't want to engage with Hashoosh, and a likely reason is that he worried that Hashoosh would then compromise them both through inexperienced scum play. This is what I thought was particularly off putting, fingering me for not pursuing Gore in a fashion acceptable to you. I then went on Catwalk for his oddball comments, but I feel more confident in him than I do you (not to say I view him as clean).
Why is the Az lynch bad? I would lynch him again, as he was making bad arguments and was the scummier of that confrontation. So he is only bad because he was against Gore in the end. And how would that incriminate me, or Zak for that matter (cant remember his vote sequence exactly) when we had been on Az from the start of the day, when the Gore push happened very late. (I would've voted Az again, don't get me wrong, but I was hardly voting to save comm.) Not only that but I had been pushing Gore the previous day, voting when he was a serious candidate and leaving it there when I knew I wouldn't be back in time for the lynch.
I am happy to claim but I don't think I should lead.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
(June 1st, 2014, 16:28)Catwalk Wrote: zakalwe, I'm very interested in seeing your theories on what setup we're looking at. If we're doing a mass claim, which we should, we will have that figured out soon enough. As far as I can see, there is now evidence for at most 2 Ts. I have also been assuming there's a SK because that's the simplest explanation for the three kills. In that case, there's just a single T, and a mass claim should be quite effective. Q, why did you vote for Hashoosh? I'll put my own vote on Q, and ask him to claim first.
If you know what I mean.
Hasoosh, editing your posts is not allowed. Please post the original and eventual versions of your post for clarity
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
I disagree strongly with a mass claim, and I will explain why later if it's not obvious to you. The wolves and the potential (highly likely) serial killer have a strong interest in a mass claim. Do all agree that one of Qg and zakalwe should claim first?
|
