Posts: 17,932
Threads: 163
Joined: May 2011
So first of all! Subforum says BtS; I have a mild preference for RtR, Dazed has a mild preference for BtS, THH and Ichabod are fine either way...Pindicator, you're our tiebreaker!
August 25th, 2014, 21:14
(This post was last modified: August 25th, 2014, 21:24 by spacetyrantxenu.)
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
Vote early and vote often, I can change it.
Also, apparently I don't know how to create a redirect link where the setup thread originally was in the Civ General forum. If anyone knows how I'll be glad to put a pointer over there. Otherwise, maybe help your comrades find where an absent minded admin has stashed your game....
Crisis averted. It turns out that basically every other mod/admin knew how to do this.
August 25th, 2014, 22:41
(This post was last modified: August 25th, 2014, 22:45 by Gawdzak.)
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 12
Joined: Mar 2014
(August 25th, 2014, 20:54)SevenSpirits Wrote: Feel free to PM or email me with map review requests.
(August 25th, 2014, 20:57)spacetyrantxenu Wrote: Gawdzak I can review the map and offer feedback as well. Just so long as players remember to direct the inevitable map backlash at you.
Thanks, will do.
So the requests so far I got is a map like 61 but (PBEM61 spoilers) .
-Toroidal
-More cramped than usual
-Quick speed
-Manually change to Standard size
-Full of Resources Lakes script
-Difficulty?
-Pick method?
-See start before picking?
Obviously with balanced strategic resource/land/starts.
Let me know if there's anything else you guys would like.
August 26th, 2014, 03:16
(This post was last modified: August 26th, 2014, 03:19 by Commodore.)
Posts: 17,932
Threads: 163
Joined: May 2011
Thanks, Gaw,
(August 25th, 2014, 22:41)Gawdzak Wrote: -Difficulty?
-Pick method?
-See start before picking? I think:
Noble BtS, Prince RtR (setting can be set after the map is done, no worry)
List of random combos BtS, anything RtR?
Yeah, probably good.
Someone with strong opinions can yell at this juncture.
Posts: 17,476
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
(August 25th, 2014, 15:04)GermanJojo Wrote: Sounds like you have a full set already, but is anyone interested in a teammate that just loves to post post post?
I'd go for a teammate, but I don't have time to be really collaborative. So if you want a team that is more "whoever plays first gets to do what they want" then yeah, go for it
I have a mild preference for BtS, simply because that scratch didn't get sufficiently itched in my last BtS attempt...
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
Unless I've miscounted, sounds like we're going BtS then. In that case, the list of random combos does sound interesting. What does everyone else think?
August 26th, 2014, 11:00
(This post was last modified: August 26th, 2014, 11:00 by Commodore.)
Posts: 17,932
Threads: 163
Joined: May 2011
BtS it is, then.
(August 26th, 2014, 10:35)TheHumanHydra Wrote: Unless I've miscounted, sounds like we're going BtS then. In that case, the list of random combos does sound interesting. What does everyone else think? Just for clarification, the process proposed would be:
-Lurker Volunteer rolls a random 20 leader/civ combos.
-Closest 10 combos in quality are chosen (not necessarily middle 10). Initial roller has final say in what makes the cut, but try to get lurker inputs
-List of these combos are given to the players
-Gawdzak gives us our start positions
-Players pick from the list, in reverse turn order 5,4,3,2,1
Seem like fun?
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 12
Joined: Mar 2014
I can roll the combos too if you want.
Posts: 17,476
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
I'm in favor of that pick method.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
I'm fine with the proposed pick method.
|