November 25th, 2014, 13:40
(This post was last modified: November 25th, 2014, 14:01 by ipecac.)
Posts: 2,698
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2011
(November 25th, 2014, 13:20)novice Wrote: What's the etiquette on endgame studies? Say, for example, that you reach a KNB vs K endgame - are you allowed to consult a guide on how to win that position? Given the opening books and databases are allowed, endgame databases should be included; I don't see why endgame books should be forbidden too.
Edit: so I checked the first post and my memory was wrong: endgame tablebases aren't allowed.
Novice: I actually looked up a (future) position in our current game using Nalimov tablebases...
The line is in the spoilers:
November 25th, 2014, 14:08
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I think there's a difference between tablebases, which tell you specifically what move to play in a given position, and endgame "algorithms", though?
I have to run.
November 25th, 2014, 14:13
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Oh, and I don't know if I'm supposed to look at that spoilered line, but at any rate let's not worry about that.
I have to run.
November 25th, 2014, 14:17
Posts: 2,698
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2011
(November 25th, 2014, 14:13)novice Wrote: Oh, and I don't know if I'm supposed to look at that spoilered line, but at any rate let's not worry about that. Well, since I got information that I wasn't supposed to have, I wanted to give you the choice of whether to see it.
My apologies for the error. How do you want the matter to proceed?
November 25th, 2014, 14:32
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Let's just play on, that spoiler is probably a Pandora's box as I don't even know what lines you are considering or what the correct evaluation of the current position is.
Here's the game, for the lurkers:
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=97793290
I have to run.
November 27th, 2014, 01:26
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
GG ipecac. That was a fun endgame struggle.
I have to run.
November 27th, 2014, 04:23
Posts: 2,698
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2011
(November 27th, 2014, 01:26)novice Wrote: GG ipecac. That was a fun endgame struggle. GG
I like the opening; I've got 2/2 so far with it
December 7th, 2014, 07:25
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
GG Zak. Turns out my knight sacrifice did give me the advantage, but proved too difficult to convert for me. Well played.
I have to run.
December 7th, 2014, 11:21
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(November 13th, 2014, 06:56)zakalwe Wrote: Zakalwe-Novice
Hmmm. Maybe I'm winning?
I can now play:
32. Re4 a3 (or he drops the pawn on a4)
33. Nxe7+ Nxe7
34. Ra4
... and the pawn on a3 drops because he must defend against the back rank mate before playing b2.
Alternatively, a more tricky line which may be what he is going for:
32. Re4 a3
33. Nxe7+ Kf8
34. Nxd5 exd5
... after which he is down *two* pieces but hitting my rook as well as threatening to play b2.
But after 35. Re2, can't I just bring my king over and clean up?
I've tried all kinds of intermediate moves and tricks but I really can't see what he's aiming for here. Maybe he just missed the threat of back rank mate - time will tell.
I missed the move 32. Re4 completely, and 31. ..Rb5 was probably my decisive mistake. The line we followed was completely improvised on my end.
I have to run.
December 7th, 2014, 15:19
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Yep, looks like the computer agrees that was a turning point, although I had some inaccuracies after that, too. Kudos for taking a chance with that knight sacrifice and playing for a win. That certainly made the game a lot more interesting.
If you know what I mean.
|