January 21st, 2015, 06:28
Posts: 2,423
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(January 20th, 2015, 21:19)Jabbz Wrote: Sadly I'm still getting used to my new schedule, so everything is hectic as hell. TBH though, I didn't sway anyone but you apparently, so he would have still swung :/
You're probably right, but regardless I do think that it is more pro-town to consolidate votes at the end of the day. You were on near the deadline, and for better or worse Jkaen looked like he wasn't going to hang. In those situations I think its best to switch to your preference of one of leading suspects. It makes it easier for scum to sway the vote if the town is spread out, and it excuses you from having to get your hands dirty.
January 21st, 2015, 07:49
Posts: 686
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
Novice I am not sure exactly when you made the appointment but your tone lately has been more authoritative than persuasive. I noticed it in the conversation with us Jowy voters your final statement was basically that you allowed town to have anti Jowy positions. We do not actually need you to validate our votes of great one.
January 21st, 2015, 07:56
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
January 21st, 2015, 08:02
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(January 21st, 2015, 07:49)Goreripper Wrote: Novice I am not sure exactly when you made the appointment but your tone lately has been more authoritative than persuasive. I noticed it in the conversation with us Jowy voters your final statement was basically that you allowed town to have anti Jowy positions. We do not actually need you to validate our votes of great one.
Gazglum asked people what they thought about Jowy, and I shared my views:
(January 20th, 2015, 11:42)novice Wrote: Some of my town leans are leaning scum on Jowy, so that is apparently possible to genuinely do. I have a pretty strong town lean on him however. Jowy's style is unorthodox but I think he's hunting well, and bringing fresh ideas to the table instead of simply going with the flow.
At the time you said nothing snarky about me validating people's votes, but rather your response was:
(January 20th, 2015, 11:46)Goreripper Wrote: Ok. I am willing to listen to evidence. How is he hunting?
Why are you now being deliberately provocative?
I have to run.
January 21st, 2015, 08:04
(This post was last modified: January 21st, 2015, 08:05 by Jowy.)
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
(January 20th, 2015, 18:57)Bobchillingworth Wrote: Don't I already have five votes on me, to your three? You're going to be in for it tomorrow data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a20/75a20cd04f66c29ea06f9e6dac40ba0f854090a5" alt="alright alright"
When there are only two wagons, and one of them is against yourself, you should always place a self-defense vote. One person you can always trust 100% in this game is yourself. Being a martyr is very very very rarely a good play.
January 21st, 2015, 08:18
Posts: 2,423
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(January 21st, 2015, 08:02)novice Wrote: Gazglum asked people what they thought about Jowy, and I shared my views:
What do you think about Jowy now?
Do you think there was scum on the Bobtrain, and if so do you have any guesses as to who?
January 21st, 2015, 08:23
Posts: 686
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
(January 21st, 2015, 08:02)novice Wrote: (January 21st, 2015, 07:49)Goreripper Wrote: Novice I am not sure exactly when you made the appointment but your tone lately has been more authoritative than persuasive. I noticed it in the conversation with us Jowy voters your final statement was basically that you allowed town to have anti Jowy positions. We do not actually need you to validate our votes of great one.
At the time you said nothing snarky about me validating people's votes, but rather your response was:
(January 20th, 2015, 11:46)Goreripper Wrote: Ok. I am willing to listen to evidence. How is he hunting? Sometimes when some thing bugs me intuitively it takes me time to process it.
(January 21st, 2015, 08:02)novice Wrote: Why are you now being deliberately provocative? The more likely you are to try and mislynch me the less likely you are to have one of your mafia teammates shoot me.
January 21st, 2015, 08:27
Posts: 686
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
(January 21st, 2015, 08:04)Jowy Wrote: (January 20th, 2015, 18:57)Bobchillingworth Wrote: Don't I already have five votes on me, to your three? You're going to be in for it tomorrow data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a20/75a20cd04f66c29ea06f9e6dac40ba0f854090a5" alt="alright alright"
When there are only two wagons, and one of them is against yourself, you should always place a self-defense vote. One person you can always trust 100% in this game is yourself. Being a martyr is very very very rarely a good play.
Again not to stop some perfectly good outrage on Brick and Bobs part but this was the single reasonable vote you have made.
But now we are back to the awful stuff.
(January 21st, 2015, 07:56)Jowy Wrote: BG on me please. What.
January 21st, 2015, 08:28
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
We should mass claim tomorrow, I think I can break the game.
January 21st, 2015, 08:29
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
BG = Bodyguard data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d404/0d4042b15d30f965121d702b660fea271f98c7bd" alt="smile smile" They killed Q so they'll come for me now that I'm obv town after being the only one to actively push us away from lynching Bob whom they couldn't have ever killed.
|