February 17th, 2015, 19:07
(This post was last modified: February 17th, 2015, 19:08 by Old Harry.)
Posts: 8,786
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
dtay for having a sensible idea. Town would never...
Surly self-destructive village-supporter who's disillusioned with his team checking in. It would just be nice for the village to win once in a while. If I ever found myself in a real-life werewolf situation with the RB crowd I'd just run for the hills.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
February 17th, 2015, 19:56
Posts: 18,036
Threads: 164
Joined: May 2011
Old Harry, you need to play in one of these! You're the reason village loses, clearly.
February 17th, 2015, 20:08
Posts: 8,786
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
Tried that, was one of the reasons village lost, didn't enjoy...
Sitting here and moaning instead is way more fun!
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
February 18th, 2015, 00:18
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Ahh the random d1 votes... We should run the deck setup again next 
February 18th, 2015, 01:11
Posts: 2,559
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2009
What are you supposed to do on d1? Barring starter information (the deck info in the last game, starting with a deathless night), the first votes have to be either meta or random, and that's a problem, right?
February 18th, 2015, 02:46
(This post was last modified: February 18th, 2015, 02:47 by Meiz.)
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
I think the first half of day 1 is completely pointless. You can get some sort of reactions from players, but as the votes are without anything concrete it's pretty easy to react to them as mafia. End of day is when the lynch starts to become a reality for the targeted player and you get real reactions out of it. With that in mind, I call bullshit on:
(February 18th, 2015, 02:31)Qgqqqqq Wrote: You had two votes. Gazglum had 3. I voted for you, pushing it up to 3v3, which I think will give better tells from players.
February 18th, 2015, 04:09
(This post was last modified: February 18th, 2015, 04:11 by Jkaen.)
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
can't believe they are trying to make an issue of the self vote, makes me suspicious of rowain, zak and Q for pushing this
February 18th, 2015, 10:05
Posts: 18,036
Threads: 164
Joined: May 2011
Grumbles about Day 1 aside, there are some reasonably substantive cases rolling already.
February 19th, 2015, 05:23
(This post was last modified: February 19th, 2015, 05:24 by Molach.)
Posts: 3,251
Threads: 18
Joined: Nov 2010
We should do some "leader" analysis like a Commodore report.
I've got one on the top of my head:
Dtay (Analytical, Ruthless)
But ruthless can be good, town-wise. Pick the most scummy target, then just go for it. Wobbling about and half-following cases is easy for wolves to manipulate.
Bandwagons are good for town.
February 19th, 2015, 13:55
(This post was last modified: February 19th, 2015, 13:55 by Jowy.)
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
I've only skimmed but it looks like Matt is being lynched for being inactive.. which he always is regardless of alignment. It's like the Dtay lynch last game. Ofc any random lynch has a certain % chance of flipping scum so maybe town gets lucky.
|
