February 19th, 2015, 10:51
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
What do you think about his play today Rowain?
February 19th, 2015, 10:53
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(February 19th, 2015, 10:38)zakalwe Wrote: I haven't had time to play today. Hence no more exploration. I have been asking repeatedly for alternative cases, though. It's not my fault if everybody just wants to vote with me.
Entertain a dying man - who are your suspects right now? Apart from the obvious one.
February 19th, 2015, 11:00
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(February 19th, 2015, 10:51)Doctor Saul Wrote: What do you think about his play today Rowain?
He was far more talkative in that game then he is now. And the very little he has posted doesn't look too good either.
February 19th, 2015, 11:10
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(February 19th, 2015, 10:27)zakalwe Wrote: Probably no more than 3 scum.
Needing 5 mislynches to win would be harsh on scum.
February 19th, 2015, 11:20
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
I honestly don't know who else to lynch, Saul. Maybe return to Brick or Q. Gaspar would be a cliché but possible. (He is more townish than usual though.) No strong opinion on Fenn.
If you know what I mean.
February 19th, 2015, 11:24
Posts: 2,423
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(February 19th, 2015, 10:33)Doctor Saul Wrote: How is it that you are blaming me for Fenn not answering my accusations? I'm not just going to hammer questions on him all day when he doesn't answer. But you don't seem to give an opinion on my accusations, only that nobody is picking up on them and for that matter they must be bad. Scum points for Gazglum for not caring about my argument, only caring about the results. And are you really saying that I must be scummy because nobody else is joining me on Fenn? So by that logic only people voting for bandwagon's are town and people who are looking at other options must be scum? That's awful Gaz.
The Doctor is in!
I don't think your argument against Fenn is very strong, which is why I didn't respond to it. Fenn parroted Lewwyn's phrasing in his first vote, and then his latest post he went through his out-of-game itinerary in a constructed seeming way, and he didn't address your initial accusation.
I think all that is true, but I think that scum are more likely to pick their words carefully than town, and so copying the role-playish dialogue isn't a scum tell for me. Nor are the rest of his posts. That's why I thought you were being half-hearted in your aggression, because I think Fenn is not a great case. And it’s not because you were alone on Fenn (I think there was someone else actually), but that you weren’t pushing it with the vigor I expected.
But this post didn't feel constructed or anything to me, and more importantly, I agree with Adrien that the silence of the last 8 hours doesn't suggest a wolf leading the tally. There may only be three wolves, but they could at least be pushing harder for Mattimeo or someone if you were one of them.
I'm swinging back to thinking we should lynch one of Mattimeo or Sunrise. It's now 4 hours till deadline, Sunrise still hasn't commented on Saul as promised, and Mattimeo’s offered us peanuts today.
I could also go Brick, who was quite active for a while when he was defending himself, without offering much except reminiscences, but was partly building up his post count by answering other people's questions and has gone lurky since making a pressure vote on Gaspar.
February 19th, 2015, 11:39
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Not super available, but I still think this is every pindicator game ever.
Still prefer Matt or sunrise over other targets. I agree with novices interpretation of Adrieniers actions, but think we'll know better after a day or two.
Of the longtime talkers, I don't have a strong lean on anyone either way. The likes ofzak and Lewwyn are good enough on both sides of the aisle that I'd rather wait a day or two and gather more info.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
February 19th, 2015, 11:41
Posts: 6,255
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2014
(February 19th, 2015, 10:41)novice Wrote: Not sure how to do that, Adrien. Btw by less thumbprints I mean less time spent slowly typing on phone/pad. On pad now so slightly more verbose.
Makes more sense. Yes phone writing is tedious, perhaps you can just post better explanations when you finally get to a solid device. Else there are too many implicits in your posts.
IDK if I already changed my vote, but I'm on Mattimeo now. Not enough posting plus not so great content in both posts.
February 19th, 2015, 11:43
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
I guess the sum for me is that I'd rather screw up on a suspicious lurker than someone who will make a greater trail if we wait til we have another dead body to interpret from.
I am willing to move to save Saul but only if I feel ok about the compromise candidate.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
February 19th, 2015, 11:44
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(February 19th, 2015, 11:24)Gazglum Wrote: I don't think your argument against Fenn is very strong, which is why I didn't respond to it. Fenn parroted Lewwyn's phrasing in his first vote, and then his latest post he went through his out-of-game itinerary in a constructed seeming way, and he didn't address your initial accusation. No, Fenn isn't a string case. But I find him suspicious and wanted him to answer some questions about his posts. Him dodging that question and the itinerary are both scum points to me and worth exploring. It's like he's hoping it will go away when I do.
What are your thoughts about the points I've made on Zak amd Fenn? I can understand someone thinking other people are stronger but please just don't dismiss me out of hand without explaining why
|
