WW 36 - Horrors in Kingsport [Game Thread]
|
(February 23rd, 2015, 23:23)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Yeah, sure. Roles can be repeated. This isn't relevant though. The scum team is 3-4 players based on any realistic estimations. Do you really think Commodore - a very creative person - would have half or over half of the scum team sharing the same role??? That's just shitty and uninteresting game design - especially in one this small. (February 24th, 2015, 01:31)novice Wrote: If Commodore is assigning roles and alignment separately, why couldn't two scum have the same role? Doesn't that rule explicitly state that he didn't "design" a role composition for each faction? I think throwing a spanner in meta lynches was the point behind that rule. Really have to agree with novice here. Though Q has been pretty consistent about being unsure about role stuff this whole game it seems. (February 24th, 2015, 05:31)AdrienIer Wrote: I have noticed the irony of attacking Fenn on inactivity when I haven't participated much, I'm on a much needed one week break right now and I've spent my last days doing absolutely nothing, being completely passive in everything, including WW. I thought I had a good reason for attacking Fenn, I stand by the fact that he had low content in his posts until he was pressured, and the other cases hadn't convinced me. I'll repeat myself here saying that Q did a reasonably good D2, also Jabbz is still in the same mood as last game, at the same time angry and disheartened, which seems like a continuation of town-Jabbz. In the end I was tempted to go after Novice but I dislike last minute wagons on principle. Can you tell us why you think Q had a good day 2? Cause I didn't really see that.
I'm sorry novice. You were right.
(February 23rd, 2015, 23:23)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Jabbzs response here - while bullheaded - is in character. Novices' is not. novice Why are you being so inactive and passive about lynching me when you're this certain on me being lynched? These passive aggressive comments are picking at anything you could possibly use to scumfirm me. That's not how town novice plays. Holy Crap Qg. What did you do copy and paste my argument and then change a few words like a cheating college student? I'm a teacher I can smell lazy plagiarism. Qgqqqqq
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Actually the more I get thinking about it I feel like I have to go back to Qgqqqqq
(February 22nd, 2015, 14:23)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Should I claim? It's a weak little thing, so I doubt it'll swing people, but should I do it anyway for full disclosure (about to go offline)? (There's some relatively useless information involved which might be useful later) (February 22nd, 2015, 14:29)Qgqqqqq Wrote: I'm something called "knower of boots" or something similar. Basically I see if anyone save myself has visited a player that night, though I don't learn their identities. It might involve the previous night as well, I need to check that, but irrelevant night 1. I checked Saul because I thought he might be visited by a village pr and I'd be good to confirm. No one visited him save me. (February 22nd, 2015, 15:48)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Ah, it is Knower of Own Boots. And I do see if anyone has visited this night or the previous. I felt like there was a difference to Matt's role, but doesn't seem to be. This whole process of claiming really just sounds super fishy to me. Asking for permission from Rowain first for something that you think is weak anyways? And I do know you're sharp, and even though you haven't been around much (which is fine), you were certainly on right after Matt's lynch cause you posted, and you didn't think to confirm that his similar sounding role to yours was the same in the 3 days since? Very sketchy. (February 23rd, 2015, 23:23)Qgqqqqq Wrote: What are you even... And then as soon as someone mentions the possibility of roles being potentially duplicated and maybe you aren't 100% scum you fly off the handle, which sounds worried that others might think that way too. Ninja edit again heh why do people keep picking up on my trails today while I'm in the process of posting them? (February 24th, 2015, 08:54)BRickAstley Wrote: Can you tell us why you think Q had a good day 2? Cause I didn't really see that. Good as in not bad, nothing stood out as scummy or really wrong. Things like post 559, that aren't great but have some kind of analysis of the situation. Scum could write that kind of posts too but his D2 is made of stuff like that, that don't make him lean more scum than before while not being good enough to lean more town. If he's scum he'll become a target by elimination at some point, if he's town he should up his game a little but he's on the right track. (February 24th, 2015, 09:12)Lewwyn Wrote: I'm sorry novice. You were right. You certainly know how to get me to stop voting for you. Qgqqqqq
I have to run.
Tally as of post 717:
3 votes: Qgqqqqq (Lewwyn, BRickAstley, novice) 1 votes: novice (Qgqqqqq) 1 votes: AdrienIer (Doctor Saul) 1 votes: Saul (Gazglum) Voting history:
I have to run.
(February 24th, 2015, 05:31)AdrienIer Wrote:(February 23rd, 2015, 21:56)Doctor Saul Wrote: So I want to vote for either Sunrise, Brick or AdrienIer now. I agree with the three amigos: Lewwyn, Gaspar, and Novice. One of you probably is scum. I'm just too chicken to pick. I gotta say I think Lewwyn gets the most town points because of his Day 2. But whatever, I'm chicken. Who's your case now AdrienIer? Cause I haven't seen you make one since the beginning of day 2. All of your posts from day 2: Post 414 is where you make your case against Qgqqqq Post 434 you ask Q if he suspects Fenn Post 436 and Post 437 and Post 439 is your back and forth with Q about the "when I flip" statement Q made, ends up being kind of non-commital Post 521 joke vote, no content Post 540 he makes the case against Fenn and changes his vote Post 545 but still has a scum lean on Q and Jabbz Post 549 and Post 550 says he'll vote Jabbz and Gazglum "without any reason whatsoever" if they don't show up Post 600 encourages Fenn to reveal Post 611 So I got that you pushed Q and then wanted to look at Fenn instead, but you still think all our candidates from yesterday at scum. Come today I don't see you pushing any of the ones that fit your theory. But the biggest problem I have of the posts I quoted is that you go from making a case against Q, having it be your own case, taking ownership for it, but at the end of the day the attitude is "I dont know what you guys are talking about". It's like you're trying to suddenly make the case be somebody else's idea -- I mean yeah, other people are against Q, they're owning it. But like Brick says, you're just kind of gliding by. |
As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer |