Making Zak rise from the dead to help us with our hunting :
That's pretty much what happened, except I wouldn't go as far as calling Lewwyn's Zak vote opportunistic.
Agreed about the 8mn left before vote part, but the rest annoys me. If you think both options are villagers you can vote for someone else, but here the superior option was going for the policy lynch because if a villager is going to die it might as well serve as a lesson for future games.
Then comes a lot of WIFOM I won't comment.
Then guess who started the Fenn wagon ?
Random attack on Gaspar for meta reasons, I'd call it a joke post but the last line means it's not.
Good points for trying to wake up town in a dreadful D2, his attack on Jabbz is good, but then (even though the case he put up is pretty convincing there, and Jabbz is definitely on my watchlist) he backpedals to the most indecisive attack ever.
Followed by
With pretty much no explanation.
So summing it up, even though he made some good points at the beginning of D2 I'm going to vote for him for the moment. Note that he started his "wake up town" posts when Jabbz and Q were the main candidates for lynch, both are on most people's scum leans. Lewwyn
(February 19th, 2015, 17:28)zakalwe Wrote:(February 19th, 2015, 16:49)Lewwyn Wrote:(February 19th, 2015, 16:48)zakalwe Wrote: The most obvious scum suspect in all of this is Lewwyn, IMO. Pretty sure that he is scum once again, looking back on this day.
Elaborate.
You followed me on Saul, said Mattimeo was innocent for saying "eh", and then took an opportunistic shot at me at the end. That's what I remember off the top of my head.
That's pretty much what happened, except I wouldn't go as far as calling Lewwyn's Zak vote opportunistic.
(February 19th, 2015, 20:05)Lewwyn Wrote:(February 19th, 2015, 19:56)novice Wrote:(February 19th, 2015, 17:35)Lewwyn Wrote:(February 19th, 2015, 17:28)zakalwe Wrote: That's what I remember off the top of my head.
When you actually check my posts I think you'll see it a bit differently.
I reread them now and they do leave some reasonable doubt. My main question is why Saul's one post on Zak was enough to sway you onto Zak. You didn't seem to suspect him earlier, and you did suspect Saul.
Looking more closely at the Zak assassination attempt and how the votes were placed it's a bit doubtful that scum could ever think it would succeed. So it's also possible it's just villagers messing about.
Did you see what time I arrived home? There were eight minutes left. At that point I skimmed a bit read a bit of Saul's post and also saw Matt and Zak on the block. Zak was at 5 I think and Matt at like 7, but when I posted was at 8, and Zak hadn't changed his vote yet. I decided I would vote for Zak (I really didn't expect him to get lynched) and even it up. I thought we had two villagers on the block.
I mean honestly if I were scum and I knew Matt was scum and I knew that he was about to be lynched and it was obvious that Matt was going to be lynched... actually I'm not sure what I would've done as scum. Probably I would have waited until after the deadline and kept my vote on Saul and not poked my head in.
Agreed about the 8mn left before vote part, but the rest annoys me. If you think both options are villagers you can vote for someone else, but here the superior option was going for the policy lynch because if a villager is going to die it might as well serve as a lesson for future games.
Then comes a lot of WIFOM I won't comment.
Then guess who started the Fenn wagon ?
(February 20th, 2015, 17:51)Lewwyn Wrote:(February 20th, 2015, 15:03)Fenn Wrote: He did have some amount of towncred from the D1 lynch situation, so I suppose he'd be as good a target as any. Good on you for giving detailed reads last night, zak.
Guess you weren't too surprised he was dead. Feels scummy Fenn. Probably shouldn't have gone with that prepackaged death response.
(February 21st, 2015, 12:05)Lewwyn Wrote:(February 21st, 2015, 10:51)Gaspar Wrote: GL Brick.
I actually don't at all trust Lewwyn's starter-zak kit routine this game, generally how I've felt when he's rolled scum, last time I just fell for buddying. At least he's talking though. On the other hand, I wonder what dtay thinks?
Actually I'm pretty sure you're scum since Zak was killed Day 1. Rule one of the Gaspar scum rulebook, kill Zak. That coupled with you not voting for Zak when it was between him and Matt tells me that you're also likely scum. Stay on Matt because Zak isn't getting lynched anyway and you can get more bussing cred. Village Gaspar would have thrown a vote on Zak for the same reasons I did. Zak is inherently suspicioius and it's fun to vote for Zak and make him sweat.
So yeah I'm sorry you had to roll scum again in your first game back in a while Gaspar.
Anyone else want to chime in on my thoughts of Gaspar?
Random attack on Gaspar for meta reasons, I'd call it a joke post but the last line means it's not.
Good points for trying to wake up town in a dreadful D2, his attack on Jabbz is good, but then (even though the case he put up is pretty convincing there, and Jabbz is definitely on my watchlist) he backpedals to the most indecisive attack ever.
(February 22nd, 2015, 14:39)Lewwyn Wrote: novice then?
Followed by
(February 22nd, 2015, 14:57)Lewwyn Wrote: Fenn
With pretty much no explanation.
So summing it up, even though he made some good points at the beginning of D2 I'm going to vote for him for the moment. Note that he started his "wake up town" posts when Jabbz and Q were the main candidates for lynch, both are on most people's scum leans. Lewwyn