[Lurker] WW #39: Escape from the Congo.

[zakalwe]

Very well played Zak. You guys managed to snag three straight mislynches, that's an accomplishment.

Only two unless I miscounted?

Thoughts on my performance, technically a spoiler:

Certainly not a great game by me, but I tried to do my duty. In my defense I was scumming it up deliberately on a couple of occasions... although that probably wasn't such a good idea.

[zakalwe]

Good job town


and thanks again novice for killing 2 townies that attacked you brother.

He also got himself night killed. While you got yourself lynched. Town can't afford to just eat the lynch in a small game. Not all your fault, and not all his fault.

[Jabbz]

Yeah two, again typing messages on the fly in a hurry before I went to get my kid :P

[Rowain]

While you got yourself lynched.

Yeah sure I got lynched for not scum-hunting (at least that was novice reason) while I was attacking scum

[Lewwyn]

Good job town. Now let's see if they can figure it out.

Small games like this always hinge on whether you can find the first scum. Town definitely has a good shot now.

I wonder if scum will kill tonight? I would no kill.

[Rowain]

The last 3 hours of yesterday were well done by town. And showed really nice WW-play from scum and town alike

Jabbz you are a great host and I like your write-ups

@Lewwyn I agree No kill is the best to mess with town-heads

[Bobchillingworth]

Why would "no kill" mess with anyone? There aren't any power roles or third parties that could otherwise explain it.

[Jabbz]

When that was written, there was little focus on any one player, so a no kill would have given the scum better chances of sowing additional discord. Now that there appears to be more focus, such a move may not work, or not be needed, depending upon the accuracy of the claims being made.

[Jabbz]

WP Gaz. Your contributions, as always, were awesome.

[Lewwyn]

Heh, I wonder if anyone's going to argue.