Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
(August 31st, 2017, 10:46)Japper007 Wrote: (August 31st, 2017, 10:28)oledavy Wrote: Random question, but what's your capital named?
Asgard, yours is probably named Jupiter right?
I was actually asking Archduke, I wouldn't expect any other name for your capital 
Ganymede actually!
September 1st, 2017, 02:56
Posts: 4,388
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
September 2nd, 2017, 11:23
Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
Woden! We welcome the people to Beija-Flor to the fold as the first foreign converts of our great religion!
September 8th, 2017, 11:56
Posts: 4,388
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
(August 18th, 2017, 19:12)Singaboy Wrote: @Archduke
Your offer of a NAP from T60 to T89 sounds interesting. There are a few things however, that I would need to impose as it could negatively affect me. As our continents are pretty close, it is theoretically possible for you to shut off access of the Straits between our Islands with city borders. Hence, I agree to a NAP from T60 to T89, under these conditions:
a. NAP comes into effect T60 to T89
b. No closure of the Straits between our Islands. (If it were to happen with city borders, Open Borders should be a given but only cover the Straits and not each others land)
c. Strictly no interference with each others home Island which includes no buying of tiles on the other Island
With the NAP running out, I would ask if you are interested in a continuation from Turn 90 to Turn 120 under the same conditions.
September 8th, 2017, 16:51
Posts: 1,629
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2016
@Archduke,
from T90 to T120 sounds like a deal I can live with.
September 8th, 2017, 19:30
(This post was last modified: September 8th, 2017, 19:30 by oledavy.)
Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
@Archduke, I would personally rather you didn't. Giving Singaboy a secure front right now seems like an unwise idea.
In fact, looking at the military standings this turn (cough, Vikings, cough), is everyone around Singaboy ready for a Great-General powered Horseman/Swordsman attack?
Speaking from personal experience over many painful turns in PBEM2, GG led attacks are nothing to mess around with, and I would rather the presumptive game leader not get free cities.
September 8th, 2017, 20:40
(This post was last modified: September 8th, 2017, 20:41 by Japper007.)
Posts: 1,094
Threads: 6
Joined: Jun 2017
(September 8th, 2017, 19:30)oledavy Wrote: @Archduke, I would personally rather you didn't. Giving Singaboy a secure front right now seems like an unwise idea.
In fact, looking at the military standings this turn (cough, Vikings, cough), is everyone around Singaboy ready for a Great-General powered Horseman/Swordsman attack?
Speaking from personal experience over many painful turns in PBEM2, GG led attacks are nothing to mess around with, and I would rather the presumptive game leader not get free cities.
I have a few tricks up my sleave don't you worry...
Agreed on Singaboy being an immense danger btw.
September 8th, 2017, 20:51
Posts: 1,629
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2016
@oledavy,
clever way to distract from your own science push to give me a dog pile while you take over the world.
@Archduke, I hope you will stick to your initial proposal of NAP from 90-120. After that, it's everyone's game. Of course, this could be followed by an alliance  A Great General and Great Admiral in unison could do some harm to the rest.
September 8th, 2017, 21:23
Posts: 3,039
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2017
September 8th, 2017, 23:27
Posts: 4,388
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
(September 8th, 2017, 20:51)Singaboy Wrote: @oledavy,
clever way to distract from your own science push to give me a dog pile while you take over the world.
@Archduke, I hope you will stick to your initial proposal of NAP from 90-120. After that, it's everyone's game. Of course, this could be followed by an alliance A Great General and Great Admiral in unison could do some harm to the rest.
I proposed it, you agreed. We already have a deal.
English ships and german armies? Sounds like a splendid idea!
|
