Turn 26
I nearly move the settler as quickly as I do the warrior, but then, wait a minute, what is there now to see?
The additional luxury right off the coast. A whale.
Well, this is a problem now. All of the sudden 2 more city sites make a lot more sense:
In front of the river on the coast in range of the whales.
On the spot behind the river, where the settler is now, where the whales are in the 3rd ring.
Or my original plan with the excellent city tile and a second tile to work off quite the bat with 1 faith.
The added luxury would be awesome for Scotland, but the sites are semi-decent. I could catch the whale with a city plan on the incense NW, but without fresh water or an aqueduct? I want to go tall.
My first instinct is to settle the plains hill regardless for more production, but then I really think about it. Another luxury, less cities. A coastal city?
Or do the compromise, stay inland, but make the whale reachable? Shipchops will be nerfed soon. But I could get maybe 1-2 galley chops in.
After a long, labourous moment, I decide I want to have the whale in sight. So Coast with a suboptimal city grid or inland on a suboptimal tile? But doing a settle in place, nicely fills out the settler view and establishes a no barb zone north.
Maybe it is my trauma from PBEM #11 but I decide on the coast.
Banzailizard if you disagree, I can still correct my mistake. But I maybe be able to chop out a galley and go exploring early.