Posts: 5,123
Threads: 112
Joined: Nov 2007
(May 1st, 2019, 18:38)Sullla Wrote: Asselis: Caesar = Caesar ; Suleiman = Nicomedes IV ; De Gaule = Vercingetorix ; Frederick = Ariovistus ; Joao = Viriathus ; Shaka = Juba I ; HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF
* * * * * * * * *
Yeah, I don't quite know what the last one means either
Neither did I, but I looked it up, because it's kind of what I do. (I work at the library.) Translated, that says basically, "Caesar and Suleiman will be best buds, and the Romans will eat everyone else," with everyone placed more or less correctly for their countries: Caesar ruled Rome; Nicomedes IV ruled in Asia Minor = Ottomanland; Vercingetorix led Gaulish armies in modern-day France; Ariovistus led a bunch of Germanic tribes; Viriathus fought (and failed) against Caesar in the west of the Iberian peninsula, including modern-day Portugal, and Juba I was ...... technically in Africa.
(Geographically, Juba really belongs in Carthage, but that was the best Asselis could do here: For all his conquering, Caesar never made it anywhere close to Southern Africa!)
May 3rd, 2019, 17:55
(This post was last modified: May 3rd, 2019, 17:58 by RFS-81.)
Posts: 851
Threads: 22
Joined: Aug 2011
Quote:While his aggression rating is only average at 5.7 out of 10, De Gaulle gets classified as an "Evil" leader via peace weight. He's actually as low as it's possible to go on the scale, sitting in the same position as leaders like Ragnar and Shaka. This suggests that someone at Firaxis was having some fun at De Gaulle's expense, especially when you consider how De Gaulle gets a rating of 0/10 in the "Resists Capitulating" category. Anyway, De Gaulle AI will be seriously unpopular with many of these other leaders, and that should produce some weird stuff before we're done.
Did De Gaule do anything to earn this low peace weight? Or is the idea that he'll get into a war with some random "good" leader and then immediately vassal himself if you let him?
Posts: 587
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2016
(May 3rd, 2019, 17:55)RFS-81 Wrote: Quote:While his aggression rating is only average at 5.7 out of 10, De Gaulle gets classified as an "Evil" leader via peace weight. He's actually as low as it's possible to go on the scale, sitting in the same position as leaders like Ragnar and Shaka. This suggests that someone at Firaxis was having some fun at De Gaulle's expense, especially when you consider how De Gaulle gets a rating of 0/10 in the "Resists Capitulating" category. Anyway, De Gaulle AI will be seriously unpopular with many of these other leaders, and that should produce some weird stuff before we're done.
Did De Gaule do anything to earn this low peace weight? Or is the idea that he'll get into a war with some random "good" leader and then immediately vassal himself if you let him?
IIRC he did some weird things like asking the allied DDay forces to let the French ride into Paris and then he claimed the French liberated themselves, but 1) it's been a long time and I just remember a general gist of "that's pretty ridiculous" on a bunch of occasions from him and 2) as far as I know he didn't do anything like the Japanese Unit 731, just sort of a goof. The French resistance probably wasn't terribly effective, but hey, they were fighting Nazis and were unquestionable the good guys.
I've seen it suggested some peace weights are to establish rivalries between certain civs like France and England, but I don't think that makes much sense unless Firaxis stated it. Then you've got France allied with Russia and England allied with Germany and Russia allied with Japan and it's just all over the place making no sense.
May 4th, 2019, 03:29
(This post was last modified: May 4th, 2019, 03:30 by AdrienIer.)
Posts: 6,259
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2014
(May 3rd, 2019, 21:30)Fluffball Wrote: IIRC he did some weird things like asking the allied DDay forces to let the French ride into Paris and then he claimed the French liberated themselves
He did ask for Leclerc's troops to be the first to enter Paris. Amusingly, the first allied troops to enter Paris were from Leclerc's division but were Spanish veterans from the civil war.
Technically Paris and its suburbs did liberate themselves : the resistance took hold of most administrative centers as the allies were getting nearer, and held most of them against German counterattacks until Leclerc arrived.
The allies originally didn't plan on taking Paris until a couple of weeks later, but they allowed Leclerc to march on after hearing about the uprising in Paris (actually they didn't really care about the uprising but Leclerc moved forward anyway and they ended up accepting the situation). It was a win-win situation : give De Gaulle a concession on who entered the city first, take control of Paris weeks before schedule, without mobilizing too many troops.
May 4th, 2019, 14:30
(This post was last modified: May 4th, 2019, 14:30 by Fluffball.)
Posts: 587
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2016
For a third week in a row Sullla calls cuirassiers a sexy cognac, Courvoisier.
May 4th, 2019, 14:34
(This post was last modified: May 4th, 2019, 14:35 by thestick.)
Posts: 2,966
Threads: 19
Joined: Mar 2012
I can't wait for this season to be over so I can launch panel data regressions on the picking contest to see whether a seed system helped or harmed our average scores .
More people have been to Berlin than I have.
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Just watched the awesome game by Caesar yesterday. If only the AP Victory counted.
Actually about that. As we all have learned the AP Victory was still active, because Shaka did not have Mass Media. But what if say de Gaulle obsoleted the AP with Mass Media, the UN was active and Shaka without Mass Media captures the AP. Would the AP reactivate?
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 246
Joined: Aug 2004
Game Three is in the books! Thanks to so many people for turning out yesterday; we topped 150 prediction contest entries again and peaked at 150 viewers (!) on the stream concurrently at one point. Here's a batch of links for the next game:
Main Season Four Webpage
Sullla Twitch Page
Sullla Discord Channel
AI Reference Guide from CivFanatics
Game Three Livestream
Next Game: Opening Round Game Four
Schedule: Scheduled for Friday, 10 May 2019 at Noon EST
Game Four Map Setup Video Preview
Game Four Written Preview
Game Four Picking Contest Entry Form
Congratulations to absynthe as the winner of Game Three's picking contest with 22 points. Scoring was much better for this game, with an average of 11.35 points after lows of 5.67 points (Game One) and 4.62 points (Game Two). It helps when the favorite lands for both Winner and First to Die.
We are back to our normal Friday date for next week's game. Do you like religious wars? Because almost every AI in the next game starts with Mysticism and is obsessed with religion. Should be fun - hope to see you there!
Posts: 5,627
Threads: 55
Joined: Oct 2010
Ooooh shall I predict 25 wars again for next week? Maybe it works out with this bunch!
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
Second lowest points from anyone who's guessed all 3 times.. @Bobchillingworth I'm coming for you next
|