sounds fun.
|
CIV VI PBEM
|
|
Do you have map preferences for Cornflakes? I think Pangaea has produced the best, most balanced games (PBEM2 stands out in my mind as the pinnacle of what a 5-player game should be), but I'm not playing in the game, merely trying to facilitate set-up so I can lurk more. Other things that come to mind are world age, general lushness, and city-states.
I Think I'm Gwangju Like It Here
A blog about my adventures in Korea, and whatever else I feel like writing about.
Continents only make sense with 6+ imo. That way one eating the other unopposed is less of an issue.
May 4th, 2020, 06:36
(This post was last modified: May 4th, 2020, 06:37 by TheArchduke.)
To get the ball rolling.
All CIVS: BEST and thus BAN: Ridiculous OP (10civs) Mapuche Russia Australia Germany Nubia Hungary Aztecs Cree Scythia Rome Good (6civs) England (Victoria) Mali India (Chandragupta) I hate those dow bonis Persia Mongolia Greece (both Pericles and Gorgo) China Korea MEDIOCRE: (13civs) Zulu France (Catherine) India (Ghandi) Sumeria Japan Khmer Maori Inca Scotland Arabia Ottoman America Holland WORST: (12civs) Brazil Poland Norway (except for a pure water map) Phoenicia Macedonia Egypt France or England (Eleanore) Sweden Kongo Spain Georgia Canada YMMV of course. 
I am in for a Pangaea map and would prefer standard age, resources, and sea level but am fine with pretty much anything.
Edit: And 2 City States per player with access to 3 for PP boost. Edit2: Small map with high seas or tiny map with low seas |
