June 23rd, 2020, 23:12
(This post was last modified: September 27th, 2020, 08:30 by BRickAstley.)
Posts: 8,617
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
Hello! Im officially dropping my "in every pitboss" to be the map maker.. ( i swear this time ) for at least one pitboss. Above there will be a poll to see what kind has any interest. Thanks!
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 6,126
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2006
You missed an option ... single city challenge
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Posts: 8,617
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
(June 24th, 2020, 08:00)Ruff_Hi Wrote: You missed an option ... single city challenge
Id rather take a nail clipper to my teeth.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 729
Threads: 7
Joined: Mar 2020
How about a teams pitboss? I mean 5 or 6 teams of two players/civs. I think this could be interesting for sharing team strategies and also, if a player has difficulties in playing a turn, the other player could make the move.
Posts: 8,617
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
(June 25th, 2020, 03:42)giraflorens Wrote: How about a teams pitboss? I mean 5 or 6 teams of two players/civs. I think this could be interesting for sharing team strategies and also, if a player has difficulties in playing a turn, the other player could make the move.
I..... dont think id volunteer for mapmaking that.. Id... NEED to play that.
Now finding someone that wants to team up with the Monty of Realms Beyond....
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
Posts: 2,941
Threads: 12
Joined: Apr 2015
Ooh, a team game could be fun.
Posts: 1,948
Threads: 19
Joined: Apr 2019
(June 26th, 2020, 00:28)El Grillo Wrote: Ooh, a team game could be fun.
seconded, especially since teamer has its own interesting meta that's been as I understand very thoroughly built up in ladder games, but not so much in pitboss.
"I know that Kilpatrick is a hell of a damned fool, but I want just that sort of man to command my cavalry on this expedition."
- William Tecumseh Sherman
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Don't get me wrong, but don't we already have a few games in which teams are playing. Like for example in PB52 Giraflorens and vanrober play together. There's nothing stopping you from playing in a team with somebody else.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
(June 26th, 2020, 03:24)Charriu Wrote: Don't get me wrong, but don't we already have a few games in which teams are playing. Like for example in PB52 Giraflorens and vanrober play together. There's nothing stopping you from playing in a team with somebody else.
I think he means 2 civs, one for each. But one spoiler thread and they can interact and play each other's turns if needed?
Sounds interesting.
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Ah, ok that makes a lot more sense now. Thanks.
|