WW 46: Wolves Return to Realms Beyond

[Chevalier Mal Fet]

Oops, I want to edit that post for readability, then remembered I can't. The spaces between entries were wider on the forum entry form, in my defense.

[Chevalier Mal Fet]

oh and my superdeath vote didn't work. superdeath?

[GeneralKilCavalry]

• GeneralKilCavalry
  Early, active participant. At first he was aggressive and rapidly swapping his suspicions around - Cyneheard and naufragar, mostly. Also had a hiccup with editting. When he was faced with pressure, he swapped to a defensive mode, mostly defending himself without reversing the attacks. I read this is a modest pro-town signal. He responded to pindicator's long post in detail at every point, though. Could be an overly defensive werewolf, could be a newbie. He's playing the newbie card hard, asking about terms like "bus" and "scum," which I guess are sort of specialized jargon. Not sure if it's sincere or if he's doing the old "just a helpless beginner" gag.  Weak town vibes at the moment.
  

In continuing my defensive streak, and reiterating one of my posts above, my post about Cyneheard was literally just responding to him trying to figure out the voting tag. Didn't really think of it as casting my vote for Cyne.

[Lewwyn]

[*]Lewwyn
Pretty active, but not a lot of real substance, I feel like. He was an early participant, lots of joking posts, and was an early joiner of the nauf bandwagon. Later, he swapped to Cyneheard, finding a long Cyneheard post scummy. He did respond to pindicator's recent posts in more detail, though. On the whole, I don't find his reasoning as persuasive as his opponent Gaspar's, and accordingly I have weak scum vibes from him.

I didn't vote for Cyneheard. I think you are confusing me with Gaspar. And why do you refer to Gaspar as my opponent? Wolf slip? No comment on my thoughts on El Grillo?

[Chevalier Mal Fet]

[*]Lewwyn
Pretty active, but not a lot of real substance, I feel like. He was an early participant, lots of joking posts, and was an early joiner of the nauf bandwagon. Later, he swapped to Cyneheard, finding a long Cyneheard post scummy. He did respond to pindicator's recent posts in more detail, though. On the whole, I don't find his reasoning as persuasive as his opponent Gaspar's, and accordingly I have weak scum vibes from him.

[*]

I didn't vote for Cyneheard. I think you are confusing me with Gaspar. And why do you refer to Gaspar as my opponent? Wolf slip? No comment on my thoughts on El Grillo?

[*]

My notes may have gotten mixed up. Need to find that Cyneheard post that was called "Scummy," maybe I did accidentally write down your name instead of Gaspar's. As for the opponent...

Right now, it looks like you and Gaspar are generally in two separate camps. Look at the people you grill and accuse, and the people he does. There's rarely overlap. 

The El Grillo thoughts seem to have come while I was writing the post. I'll look over 'em and get back to you, but right now it's 11:15 pm my time and I have to teach in the morning. :

TODO: read Lewwyn's thoughts on El Grillo; find Cyneheard long post that was called scummy and see who I meant to write instead of Lewwyn. Catch up on overnight posts.

[Lewwyn]

Save yourself a bit of hassle and set your forum settings to 40 posts per page.

Also CMF My El Grillo thoughts came with my response to pindicator which you mention as well. So in fact my El grillo vote came before you started.

It's fine, but it does make me suspicious of you, rolling up with this LIST. It's a list that is at least partially made up of "this is what happened" rather than this person is scummy because of this, or this person is townie because of this.


Then again I don't want to be too harsh since you've had a long day, and I'd like people to play again in the future...

[Lewwyn]

Additional RB WW tips for all newbies: When in the gaming table forum, click on the number of replies to this thread. You will see who has posted and how many times. Click again on that number of posts and you will see all their posts. Much easier to find specific things.

[Bobchillingworth]

Being late I thought there would be some catching to do but this is much much more than what I expected... I thought that the game would involve about 3-4 checks/posts per 24h (in comparison, in the game I played you got to speak exactly once per game day). I'll PM brick to ask of there is someone on the waiting list as they'll participate and enjoy the game more than I would, and if not I'll continue but even at best it won't be nearly to the same level as the rest of you guys. Once every few hours is the maximum I can do and if there are a few new pages to read every time it would be more of a chore than not... And on day 6 you dissect everything that was said previously?!?!

Trust me, you don't have to read every post, just as almost nobody opens a newspaper and reads every story. If you're scum, I'm sure your team can help you contribute. If you're village, then skim the spam, and over time you'll develop a sense both for the content worth taking into consideration (like role claims and discussions thereof) and the players who are engaging in anti-town behavior like filling the thread with volumes of low-value content.


It's not the end of the world if you get lynched anyway, so long as your death gives the village some useful information. The form of that information is up to you.

[Bobchillingworth]

Also, reading Chev's long participant rundown post, I realized there's special vote tags we can use (I was just making my text bolded and red), so Lewwyn

[Charriu]

• He gives the impression of a family guy doing hsi best to participate in the game with the time he has, and seems good-spirited so far. 
  

That's absolutely spot on. Also I just woke up and I am in the EU time zone. Wanted to do a longer post, but I'm on the phone and hell no I'm not doing complex multiquotes on this device.
Overall trying to keep up with the pace. Have to see where the current vote tally is at. Quick theoretical question. Can I go neutral again with my vote?