[Game Thread] WW49: Wizards and Werewolves

[Serdoa]

Point taken, I tend to do that even if it’s not always ideal. But it’s also a way to encourage reticent posters to elaborate.

Yes, you were supposed to remember thrawn’s play.

I don't. And I'd rather not go through that game-thread now tbh, so maybe you can summarize what was important about his play then? You seem to indicate that he played similar to now? Which makes you lean town on him?

[Rowain]

@the rogue and the warrior: It is a very easy and cowardly vote on the sorcerer. With an easy argument.
For me this a rather un-Serdoa vote.

[Rowain]

@Warrior & Rogue
I find it very strange you two talking about WW46 when he dropped out of that game early day 1 with 3 posts total.

[novice]

My question on whether or not the Sourcerer's performance in the summer of '46 factored into your vote on the Rogue was an honest one. I seem to remember villager thrawn catching a lot of heat exactly for trying too hard. If I've picked up that impression from casual lurking I would expect active players to have done so as well. I could be mixing up the years, though.

[novice]

@the rogue and the warrior: It is a very easy and cowardly vote on the sorcerer. With an easy argument.
For me this a rather un-Serdoa vote.

Regardless of the Sourcerer's past history I guess this justification stands on its own legs.

So it's an easy vote, and an un-Serdoa one, you say. But is it a wrong vote?

[Serdoa]

@the rogue and the warrior: It is a very easy and cowardly vote on the sorcerer. With an easy argument.
For me this a rather un-Serdoa vote.

I'm kinda getting annoyed by novice asking the same questions that I have in mind but it makes sense to ask them of course:

1) Why is it un-Serdoa? I would actually say that it fits my way of looking at the game quite well. Basically I don't feel thrawn flailing around is honest. One post about the subject, maybe a second ok. But posting up a flurry about what character to play makes it seem as if that was somehow really important. And that either means that he wants desperately to fit in or he wants to post about something to be or appear active. Both things are common among wolves because you the first few times, you always feel like everyone is watching you. You basically mirror your own knowledge onto the others.

2) Why is that vote in your opinion easy and cowardly? I honestly just don't understand how you even mean that, given the amount of time the game was underway when I made that vote.

[Rowain]

@the rogue and the warrior: It is a very easy and cowardly vote on the sorcerer. With an easy argument.
For me this a rather un-Serdoa vote.

Regardless of the Sourcerer's past history I guess this justification stands on its own legs.

So it's an easy vote, and an un-Serdoa one, you say. But is it a wrong vote?

Can thrawn be bad - yes - Me not in der "handing out free passes" -business ask tin-man for that.
But I believe his talks so far are rather thrawn no matter of alignment.

[Serdoa]

@Warrior & Rogue
I find it very strange you two talking about WW46 when he dropped out of that game early day 1 with 3 posts total.

Allso: I did actually not remember till you reminded me (and even so I had to think about it). But yeah, you are right, he dropped out because of the necessary time commitment IIRC. That probably means novice refers to WW47 which I did not play and not read. 

Anyhow, why do you find it strange that we two are talking about it, when I just responded to novice? I'd get if you looked at novice for that, but what have I to do with that, especially when I clearly state that I can't remember what he refers to.

[Rowain]

@the rogue and the warrior: It is a very easy and cowardly vote on the sorcerer. With an easy argument.
For me this a rather un-Serdoa vote.

I'm kinda getting annoyed by novice asking the same questions that I have in mind but it makes sense to ask them of course:

1) Why is it un-Serdoa? I would actually say that it fits my way of looking at the game quite well. Basically I don't feel thrawn flailing around is honest. One post about the subject, maybe a second ok. But posting up a flurry about what character to play makes it seem as if that was somehow really important. And that either means that he wants desperately to fit in or he wants to post about something to be or appear active. Both things are common among wolves because you the first few times, you always feel like everyone is watching you. You basically mirror your own knowledge onto the others.

2) Why is that vote in your opinion easy and cowardly? I honestly just don't understand how you even mean that, given the amount of time the game was underway when I made that vote.

He is an easy targets for badies to put a vote: And the argument "you try too hard " is impossible to counter.

For me that is not you.

[Rowain]

@Warrior & Rogue
I find it very strange you two talking about WW46 when he dropped out of that game early day 1 with 3 posts total.

Allso: I did actually not remember till you reminded me (and even so I had to think about it). But yeah, you are right, he dropped out because of the necessary time commitment IIRC. That probably means novice refers to WW47 which I did not play and not read. 

Anyhow, why do you find it strange that we two are talking about it, when I just responded to novice? I'd get if you looked at novice for that, but what have I to do with that, especially when I clearly state that I can't remember what he refers to.

You were there so me thinks you should remember it. Replacing thrawn with Meiz is something to take note off especially as wolf.