October 27th, 2020, 12:34
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
October 27th, 2020, 12:34
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
October 27th, 2020, 12:36
Posts: 6,255
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2014
Ok so you can't quote people, but it's only for a part of the day.
October 27th, 2020, 12:42
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(October 27th, 2020, 12:29)pindicator Wrote: Rowain, you're correct- but all of those are less likely outcomes. I'm sure future nights will help delve into it more.
Speaking of votes, assuming the unaccounted 0.1 is passive then it's down to 3 people. But for our completionists in the group, I suppose it could be a day ability that is granted by PM and then :shrug:
From those 3 I can see it a power of Gazglum most likely because Paladins as leaders
WK as Wizard second.
Don't see it fitting for Rogue Serdoa.
Another possibility for 1 death is of course that either one tried to kill a Hider.
And since I'm in a speculative mood: Maybe Tarkeel got killed because munchkins expected Serdoa to hide behind him. (Look at the "I guess you can avoid death" talk).
October 27th, 2020, 12:44
Posts: 17,462
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
(October 27th, 2020, 11:53)Lewwyn Wrote: Pindicator I'm feeling fine
he's agreeing with me most of the time.
Laddie, where ha' I been agreein wit ya most of the time? Suspectin' the barbarian? Where else?
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
October 27th, 2020, 12:51
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(October 27th, 2020, 11:58)Serdoa Wrote: Question: Did we ever reach that opportune time novice? I can't seem to find when you laid it all out, I believe you didn't.
I did, in post 208.
I have to run.
October 27th, 2020, 12:56
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(October 27th, 2020, 12:51)novice Wrote: (October 27th, 2020, 11:58)Serdoa Wrote: Question: Did we ever reach that opportune time novice? I can't seem to find when you laid it all out, I believe you didn't.
I did, in post 208.
Oh, you mean how I "disagreed with most of what I read"? IIRC, it was nothing more concrete than your over the top attack on AdrienIer, and what I perceived as likely town-on-town bickering between Lewwyn and Rowain. Of course, when I tried to untangle that action, Rowain went haywire and declared me obvscum, so that kind of put a damper on that impression.
I have to run.
October 27th, 2020, 13:07
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(October 27th, 2020, 11:58)Serdoa Wrote: Rowain
The first 9 posts all occurred in the first 4 hours of the game and are roleplay mostly. The last one of these skates the line by calling out those that had not participated yet, before I assume Rowain headed to bed. When he woke up in the morning, he voted me. In retrospect the timeline looks off. To better illustrate:
19:44 - I vote thrawn (#38)
22:05 - next post by Rowain after I made mine, calling out those that have not joined (#44)
08:13 - votes me (and calls Gaz out for handing out freebies = declaring people he won't lynch)
There was not really much happening after my vote and his next post (5 short posts). I don't understand why he isn't mentioning it in #44. That indicates that he only made up his mind later on.
The next 18 posts are only about his vote, answering others questioning it. #212 is the first one which is not about the vote, with making a statement on Gaz (he does not think Gaz is scum) and that he won't vote pindicator on D1. Then several more posts on the whole vote-affair. #239 is interesting insofar as Rowain is telling Gaz that he should not hand a town-tell to pindi just because pindi made one post agreeing with Gaz. Given that in #212 he stated he won't vote pindicator I have issues with that. Stating that you won't vote someone is not different to stating that you have a town-lean on someone. If you had not, you would not categorically dismiss the possibility to vote for them. But Rowain disagrees on this point, in #258 when asked the question he states that he thinks pindi suspicious - but also reiterates that he won't vote for him. I couldn't find any reasoning for why that is the case - though that is not a scum-tell imo, just bad play imo.
Serdoa I'm sure you looked through the thread as good as you can and I believe you had no ill intent but still you missed this:
(October 25th, 2020, 14:45)Rowain Wrote: @pindi
While I find your vote for me strange especially your statement:
But I can't vote off someone who loves OotS enough to have Durkon as avatar and try his accent. I only hope you are original recipe durkon and not the spawn of hel.
I'm now at a loss what to do. Perhaps I need to post in bold size 40 letters that people start to read them? Do I need to sprinkle rainbows and unicorns around them?
October 27th, 2020, 13:12
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(October 27th, 2020, 12:42)Rowain Wrote: (October 27th, 2020, 12:29)pindicator Wrote: Rowain, you're correct- but all of those are less likely outcomes. I'm sure future nights will help delve into it more.
Speaking of votes, assuming the unaccounted 0.1 is passive then it's down to 3 people. But for our completionists in the group, I suppose it could be a day ability that is granted by PM and then :shrug:
From those 3 I can see it a power of Gazglum most likely because Paladins as leaders
WK as Wizard second.
Don't see it fitting for Rogue Serdoa.
Another possibility for 1 death is of course that either one tried to kill a Hider.
And since I'm in a speculative mood: Maybe Tarkeel got killed because munchkins expected Serdoa to hide behind him. (Look at the "I guess you can avoid death" talk).
That last seems oddly specific
Were you hoping for something terrific?
Or was tarkeel killed to save superdeath
From a druids breath?
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
October 27th, 2020, 13:19
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(October 27th, 2020, 12:56)novice Wrote: (October 27th, 2020, 12:51)novice Wrote: (October 27th, 2020, 11:58)Serdoa Wrote: Question: Did we ever reach that opportune time novice? I can't seem to find when you laid it all out, I believe you didn't.
I did, in post 208.
Oh, you mean how I "disagreed with most of what I read"? IIRC, it was nothing more concrete than your over the top attack on AdrienIer, and what I perceived as likely town-on-town bickering between Lewwyn and Rowain. Of course, when I tried to untangle that action, Rowain went haywire and declared me obvscum, so that kind of put a damper on that impression.
You didn't try to untangle it. You accused me of not having answered Lewwyns question. Then I showed you I did then you made attempts to still paint me as the bad guy. You did nothing to untangle here. You did your best to keep the rowain is scum-pan on the fire.
|