PB 59 organizing and tech thread

[Cornflakes]

I might play, but map size might be a deal breaker for me, need to think about it for bit. PB38 end game was rough.

This exactly.

[Mjmd]

I might play, but map size might be a deal breaker for me, need to think about it for bit. PB38 end game was rough.

This exactly.

My vote for 100-110 tiles per player was definitely trying to balance small map people vs people who want more space vs UMMMM this going to be crazy late game if everyone gets 120 tiles per.

[Commodore]

PB38 was some absurd ~200 per player, if I recall. Insane.

[Mjmd]

PB38 was some absurd ~200 per player, if I recall. Insane.

Ok; 120 tiles per player seems reasonable by comparison now lol. I still would say 110 per would be a good medium.

[The Black Sword]

I just looked up PB38, actually 230 per player! PB13 was 140 and PB53 was 80.

I'd play a 100 tiles per player, depending how many signups we get I might go a bit larger.

[Miguelito]

I think the best will be for everybody who is interested in playing to fill in votes, and mark in the spreadsheet where their possible red lines are. Cairo asked explcitly for 120+ tiles per player, not sure how strict he is on that. If we can find a compromise great, in the worst case we have to take an average of the votes and if somebody wants to bow out at that point then that's it.

TBS / Cornflakes, can I put you on the signup list under these conditions?

[Charriu]

[Cornflakes]

PB38 was some absurd ~200 per player, if I recall. Insane.

Hmmm ... I wonder who generated that map ... who, me?

Put me down at slot #22

[Jowy]

I don't know about tile counts but I'd at least not like to be competing for tiles with my 2nd city ala PB56.

[pindicator]

PB38 was some absurd ~200 per player, if I recall. Insane.

I know 38 is getting a lot of attention for this, but 46 was just as bad. think I hit 50 cities before my first real war.  I don't expect that to be an issue with this map.  Or really any map ever.