[SPOILERS] Lurkers Rooting for More Destruction
|
(June 14th, 2024, 23:20)Magic Science Wrote: Anyway, in a “normal” Raging Barbarians game, The Great Wall would be an excellent Wonder and worth building early. Building it in the capital before the first Settler would be a huge blow to the snowball, but it would likely be worth it. However, this is not a “normal” Raging Barbarians game, and in my opinion the known and possible changes from “normal” make trying to build The Great Wall so soon a bad gamble. Magic Science is right, and it's good to see someone piece this together. Based on my tests, the barbarian invasions will be quite limited. Given the additional restrictions on Great Spies, I don't think the wonder is all that great here at all. Not awful, but I think something like Stonehenge would prove to be much more valuable. Humorously though, in one of my final barb tests, the barbs actually destroyed an AI player. I wondered why, and then I realized it was because I ran the test after setting the player difficulties to Monarch, which meant the AI was playing with far fewer tools than they have on their usual Noble.
Hmm. Should I say this in other threads? I mentioned it because he was discussing spawn rates and as I haven't seen the map, I didn't think it beyond a global lurker to say, but a little concerned it's something I shouldn't have said to just one player:
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
No, it's too close to strategic advice if they're not talking about barb spawn mechanics. I think it's fine if they're talking about the spawncap to provide details, but telling Gavagai now would absolutely impact the game which is a giant no-no.
To be fair there has been a lot of unasked for lurker input in my opinion on mechanics already, which is why I think Q feels like he should share the same information with everyone.
(June 15th, 2024, 18:56)Cyneheard Wrote: No, it's too close to strategic advice if they're not talking about barb spawn mechanics. I think it's fine if they're talking about the spawncap to provide details, but telling Gavagai now would absolutely impact the game which is a giant no-no. The flip side is that Q already impacted the game for one player so the fair thing to do is impact it for all of them. I'd vote for telling everyone as the less-objectionable option now.
I'm not sure I saw any unasked-for mechanics information, but actually, I want to note somewhere (I think someone - maybe Magic Science - asked about this too, but I'd have to dig up where) that the Great Wall will have a big potential effect: When barbs end up in your borders due to border expansion or city placement, if you have the Great Wall, they instantly vanish! It won't affect longbows in cities unless the cities flip, but it might be the easiest way to get rid of a random mace/Jan/etc and get at the tile it's guarding.
Huh, that is interesting.
Yeah, I guess the thing is he was talking about spawn rates, and while Scooter has hinted at the Great Wall being less powerful, and that there might be barb cities, that wasn't really what I had in mind.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
I would not share it further, personally. The comment was a bit borderline, but it's quite common for mechanics clarifications to come from lurkers when the players are already discussing mechanics openly. Offering it up openly in every thread for no apparent reason invites more questions I think.
Also, I think players who haven't (publicly) thought about this may do so soon anyway. It's T8 now, and no animals have spawned. Pretty soon players will start to wonder why they aren't getting any Animals on Raging Barbs. I would leave it be, but answer mechanics questions as they come up. |
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |