Ah so that was the situation. Sorry for saying things without fully knowing the full extent.
We just watch. And Judge. FFH PBEM III Lurker Thread.
|
The chat between Mardoc and myself did actually happen. The relevant sections:
Quote:me: hehe. I've no idea....something keeps me chasing all over the tech tree though.... There was a fair bit of back and forth banter and BSing going on, including an outright lie in regards to my chosen path to victory. The chat took place about two months ago and I was a bit corked at the time so I can't really comment on what I was thinking at the time, but I certainly didn't see my comment about not being able to own the world before tun 210 as a violation of the confidentiality clause regarding a NAP that expired on turn 195. It actually took me about half an hour to find the relevant chat after I got WK's "I've found a flimsy excuse to DOW you now" email.
Check post #241. That's pretty conclusive I'd think. I don't think we can know for sure since Heisenberg is gone and presumably we have no way of asking his friend.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. Bobchillingworth Wrote:So... who actually used the infamous privateer, assuming it ever existed? I don't know for sure, but I can say that there was a wounded privateer in a Sheaim port the turn after Mist says the Elohim caravel disappeared. Didn't check that until well after it didn't matter anymore, but I think Heisenberg actually was guilty there.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker
Had to be Heisenberg. Pointless risk to take to kill an inconsequential unit imo. In any case, the "coalition" was already in bad shape by then due to its failure to coordinate any military action against Thoth.
|