(May 2nd, 2013, 09:00)Bigger Wrote:(May 2nd, 2013, 02:59)NobleHelium Wrote: Pitboss 7 failed because the double move rule was not followed.
well there was no double move rule. some people even felt it was encouraged.
This kind of statement was one of the reasons why the double move rule was not followed.

The double move rule was to not intentionally double move, but if it happened naturally in the course of playing, then so be it. Repeatedly camping the start and end of a turn to double move every turn was not supposed to happen, but it did.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
