(May 21st, 2013, 07:22)Krill Wrote:(May 20th, 2013, 19:59)NobleHelium Wrote: Krill, we've said several times that we don't play your mod because you make too many changes that we don't agree with. You make some changes that we do agree with, and swapping AH and Hunting is probably one of them, but I'm not interested in playing with the rest of your baggage just to get that fix.
I'll just say that I'm happy to have helped develop a mod and gametype that has been used for two PB games successfully with enough players to set up a third right now, when every PB before then had collapsed in ignominy and masochism. If there are enough people who think otherwise and are having fun playing with it, I couldn't care less about your opinion.
Why are you still trying to persuade us to play it then?
And what does the successfulness of the PBs have to do with anything? It's not like the mod has some quality that makes people less likely to get pissed off at each other or behave in a ridiculous manner like completely ignoring the spirit of the rules. The new PBs are played under AI diplo, and they don't have Lord Parkin in them. That is the difference.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
