October 24th, 2018, 17:18
Posts: 17,433
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
In pb38 everyone was rolled 2 leaders and 1 civ. They could either reroll the civ or the leaders. Either 1 or 2 total rerolls given - I can't recall.
And nobody's picks were given out until all picks were finalized.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
October 24th, 2018, 18:05
Posts: 23,428
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Post your threads. Starting pictures are coming.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
October 24th, 2018, 18:06
Posts: 8,611
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
PB38, everyone was rolled 2 leaders, 1 civ, and could reroll Civ, Leaders, or both. 2 rerolls were given. Could not save 1 leader and reroll 1, had to be both.
As far as rules-
fish/fish copper/copper style deals allowed, and are we doing 8.4 or 8.3 mod?
I believe there was a consensus or at least a couple people wanting to ban zulu and inca?
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow. In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."
-Old Harry. PB48.
October 24th, 2018, 18:08
(This post was last modified: October 24th, 2018, 18:12 by naufragar.)
Posts: 2,932
Threads: 25
Joined: Jun 2012
PB38 picking was two re-rolls.
I originally said 2.0.8.3, but I'm happy with .4 too.
Edit: Lots of ninjas. I think only Cairo and I were for .3. Everybody else was overwhelmingly for .4. And yeah, I haven't heard anyone speak up for saving Zulu or Pro/Inca from the ban list. (Not sure how to ban a combo in the pb38 pick method. Just reroll entirety of options if a player would've been presented with it? Idk.)
There is no way to peace. Peace is the way.
October 24th, 2018, 19:23
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
(October 24th, 2018, 18:06)superdeath Wrote: As far as rules-
fish/fish copper/copper style deals allowed, and are we doing 8.4 or 8.3 mod?
I believe there was a consensus or at least a couple people wanting to ban zulu and inca?
I think the fish/fish deals are silly and prefer to offer real trades with real trading partners when it makes sense, but I don't care about banning them. I wouldn't put a ton of stock in them, though. With that said, I do recall making a horse/horse offer with Adrien in PB38 not long before the Aztecs were partitioned, so I'm a hypocrite and I acknowledge it.
I don't really care about banning particular combos but just for the sake of variety I'm fine with no Zulu/Inca since they seem to appear in almost every game.
Not sure if I mentioned it upthread or not but I prefer 2.0.8.4 because exploration should be rewarded and it'll save me five seconds on updating my desktop shortcut.
October 24th, 2018, 19:28
Posts: 2,623
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2014
(October 24th, 2018, 19:23)spacetyrantxenu Wrote: (October 24th, 2018, 18:06)superdeath Wrote: As far as rules-
fish/fish copper/copper style deals allowed, and are we doing 8.4 or 8.3 mod?
I believe there was a consensus or at least a couple people wanting to ban zulu and inca?
I think the fish/fish deals are silly and prefer to offer real trades with real trading partners when it makes sense, but I don't care about banning them. I wouldn't put a ton of stock in them, though. With that said, I do recall making a horse/horse offer with Adrien in PB38 not long before the Aztecs were partitioned, so I'm a hypocrite and I acknowledge it.
I don't really care about banning particular combos but just for the sake of variety I'm fine with no Zulu/Inca since they seem to appear in almost every game.
Not sure if I mentioned it upthread or not but I prefer 2.0.8.4 because exploration should be rewarded and it'll save me five seconds on updating my desktop shortcut.
Agree with the all of the above.
October 25th, 2018, 03:33
Posts: 1,996
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2009
October 25th, 2018, 04:07
Posts: 23,428
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
I'm ready to post screenshots. Are you guys ready to receive them?
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
October 25th, 2018, 04:13
Posts: 1,996
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2009
IDK, I was poised for another 6 month pregame.
October 25th, 2018, 04:32
Posts: 23,428
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
I don't fuck about when it comes to setting up games.
Heads up, map dimensions are 84*52, tech costs are details are in this spreadsheet (All thanks goes to Seven).
Map is standard size. 1351 land tiles, 169/player. Starting screenshots are posted in the lurker thread and will be posted in player threads when you've settled on game rules and any pick/bands etc. I'm finished, everything else can be directed to Mardoc (and I have sent him the WBS as of this post).
I have one request: Will you allow me to make another version of the mod whereby fishing boats do not require Fishing to be built (but you still need to have Fishing to work coastal tiles)? This is the exact same change that Seven put into ToW, and it is one I have intended to put in for years, however I kept on forgetting I hadn't implemented it. I can have this up and posted by tonight (it's just a single XML change so takes no time).
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
|