October 16th, 2019, 00:21
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Looks like the winner in the war between Cornflakes and Superdeath is JR4.
October 19th, 2019, 07:13
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Feels like it was a long time since anybody signed a defensive pact here on RB, am I right?
October 19th, 2019, 07:35
Posts: 2,932
Threads: 25
Joined: Jun 2012
(October 19th, 2019, 07:13)Charriu Wrote: Feels like it was a long time since anybody signed a defensive pact here on RB, am I right?
EitB PBEM 53 Spoilers:
There is no way to peace. Peace is the way.
November 3rd, 2019, 21:06
Posts: 3,928
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2017
I don't know much about Civ IV, but I've been following this game to try and learn.
It seems odd to me that JR4's refrain all game long has been complaining about how much less land he has than the other players - yet every time he talks about expanding aggressively to fix that he balks. He didn't pile in on wetbandit when Cornflakes tried to incite a dogpile, he fought a brief war with superdeath and then instantly made peace, he backed off from fighting Mr. Cairo, he didn't pile on Cornflakes or superdeath during their war, he talked about load up Galleons to go (belatedly) after wetbandit, then abandoned that plan.
The question I'm asking is, was he right to back off every time, even knowing he has this long-term problem of insufficient land? I don't know enough about Civ IV to estimate his chances, either in war or in peace.
November 3rd, 2019, 21:56
Posts: 368
Threads: 2
Joined: Feb 2018
I think he is trying to secure a great enough military advantage before pushing expansion/war. Such as Infantry vs rifles.
November 3rd, 2019, 23:09
Posts: 17,846
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
(November 3rd, 2019, 21:56)Hollybombay Wrote: I think he is trying to secure a great enough military advantage before pushing expansion/war. Yeah, but...
(November 3rd, 2019, 21:56)Hollybombay Wrote: Such as Infantry vs rifles. ...ain't it.
November 4th, 2019, 14:17
Posts: 368
Threads: 2
Joined: Feb 2018
Worked for me vs AI. Do you need to be two military techs higher to beat players?
November 4th, 2019, 14:23
Posts: 23,428
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
On a map like this it isn't tech, it's positional play and opportunism that wins from this point.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
November 16th, 2019, 13:11
Posts: 7,602
Threads: 75
Joined: Jan 2018
Seeing that PB44 ended before 43 and this one being very much undecided so far, what was the longest running PB (turn number) here on RB?
November 16th, 2019, 14:53
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
Pb18 ended on t275. None of my other games got near that.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
|