Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
So..... not even one person interested in logging into the game to check out that offer? Apparently kjn and I are the only ones who actually log into the game with any frequency. Well, here's what WPC had to say:
These guys just refuse to use email for some reason. Well, the real question is whether they want a fourth missionary, or if they are unaware of the third missionary that's moving next to their borders right now. If this deal is for the current missionary, then great! It's already about to move into their territory next turn. If they want yet another missionary (#4), then we're probably going to have to decline. We're swapping out of Organized Religion next turn, and we won't be returning to it for another 7t (i.e. nearly one month of real world time). We need clarification from them on this issue. I am not moving heaven and earth to get one more missionary to WPC when we've already sent them two and have a third one about to enter their territory. Umm... have fun with these guys, scooter. They seem a bit crazy.
LOL at WPC. In defense of few people logging into the game, btw, it is modded with a mod that nobody else here ever uses (or, I'd imagine, really wants to use). I don't even have it downloaded.
Merovech's Mapmaking Guidelines:
I think this is the only way we'll ever have an archer. I sorta like the idea of having an archer even though we will never research archery.
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!
"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." “I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
I think we can assume the archer is payment for the third missionary, though it never hurts to make sure.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
It could hurt to make sure if they decide to use it as an opportunity to squeeze a fourth Missionary .
Darrell
Agree with darrell. I'd just say something like "Sure - sounds good. The missionary will be there next turn. Please gift the archer at <wherever we want it>"
We should definitely make sure. Or say something to the effect of, "yes, based upon our earlier discussion in chat, you offered to trade an archer for every missionary after the second. We have a third missionary on the way to you now, so we'd like a six experience archer with unspent promotions please. Please gift one at earliest opportunity - anywhere just inside our borders is fine. Thanks."
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
What is the advantage of "making sure" over acting like the Archer is for the third Missionary?
Darrell
So that they don't start acting like we promised them a fourth missionary which we aren't going to build. Based upon their recent behavior, I'd say that's a distinct possibility. What is the disadvantage?
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. |
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |