Do we need a poll? This question is both urgent and divisive.
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
Urgent? I don't think the fast worker thing is urgent. And yes, even if we do ask them (leaning towards just skipping it now since that seems to be the general majority opinion), it's highly likely they ask for too much.
no. just defer to sulla. I don't see the harm in closing borders preemptively. we can reopen them when the missionary leaves.. and I believe we have plenty of trade routes, no?
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
I'd be OK with asking a price for a pair of fast workers. We could sell them a line about trying to speed up hacking away a lot of jungle tiles if they want to know why we want them.
I'd be OK with trading a pair of knights for a pair of fast workers. It isn't like they can do a lot of damage to us with two knights, but to them the units could be somewhat valuable dealing with their Spanish problem. Maybe they'd go for it (once we can build them anyway). Played: Pitboss 18 - Kublai Khan of Germany Somalia | Pitboss 11 - De Gaulle of Byzantium | Pitboss 8 - Churchill of Portugal | PB7 - Mao of Native America | PBEM29 Greens - Mao of Babylon (April 23rd, 2013, 17:40)Bigger Wrote: no. just defer to sulla. I don't see the harm in closing borders preemptively. we can reopen them when the missionary leaves.. and I believe we have plenty of trade routes, no? (April 23rd, 2013, 17:28)NobleHelium Wrote: I would be extremely hesitant to re-open borders with CivPlayers if we close them. We will not be able to cancel them again for ten turns without declaring war, which would sort of break the NAP. So yeah.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. (April 23rd, 2013, 17:28)NobleHelium Wrote: I would be extremely hesitant to re-open borders with CivPlayers if we close them. We will not be able to cancel them again for ten turns without declaring war, which would sort of break the NAP. So yeah. Shrug. If we close them and then explicitly say "you cannot enter our borders" and then re-open them and they move in anyways... That's an equivalent agreement violation. So I'd say screw them and declare war to break the OB in that case. I'm not afraid of that scenario is what I"m saying.
I'm just saying that it's likely going to be an event that's open to interpretation by other teams if we declare war on them, regardless of the actual reasoning or situation.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone.
They're going to crap themselves if they see Close Borders -> Edu/Lib/Nationalism -> Nationhood -> Mass Drafting. I would give up on good relations with them and spend our time trying to figure out how to keep everyone from killing us.
Or you know, tell them after we declare on the Germans "we needed a good alibi."
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!
"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must." “I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
We need to respond to WPC. Here's their message for reference.
Suggested response: Draft to WPC Wrote:Tatu, First paragraph is just giving them a meaningful response so we keep them in tune, second paragraph just responds to their light-hearted poke in kind. Thoughts? |