Posts: 5,636
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
(May 8th, 2013, 02:39)antisocialmunky Wrote: Quote:Hi Caledorn,
Thanks for the offer but its not a good time, can we have it in about 10 turns? I'm sure you need it for something since the Spanish have delayed its hook up for so long.
Your Friends,
RB
That's good - it says "we know what you did" without being threatening.
May 8th, 2013, 07:21
(This post was last modified: May 8th, 2013, 07:22 by darrelljs.)
Posts: 8,770
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
(May 8th, 2013, 06:40)Cyneheard Wrote: (May 8th, 2013, 02:39)antisocialmunky Wrote: Quote:Hi Caledorn,
Thanks for the offer but its not a good time, can we have it in about 10 turns? I'm sure you need it for something since the Spanish have delayed its hook up for so long.
Your Friends,
RB
That's good - it says "we know what you did" without being threatening.
Yeah, that's the best one I've seen yet .
Edit: I might change the smiley to a winking smiley.
Darrell
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 20
Joined: Feb 2011
(May 8th, 2013, 00:43)NobleHelium Wrote: Spies don't get caught when you have OB. Does CFC even have Alphabet?
I was not aware of this. I don't use spies very often.
Azoth:
Just because we aren't planning to attack CFC doesn't mean there isn't value in making them wonder if we are. They would NAP-stab us over the sort of BS they just did, so they will be wondering if we would do the same. Especially given our history with Imperio in the previous game.
Why are we so eager to reassure these guys? How does that possibly benefit us in any way, now or ever? Even if you're right and we want a NAP renewal with them, we're more likely to get it if they perceive us as dangerous. If we make it abundantly clear, as we hae so far, that we would NEVER EVER EVER attack them, a NAP has zero value to them and they will continue openly doing things that jeopardize it.
Active in:
FFH-20: Jonas Endain of the Clan of Embers
EITB Pitboss 1: Clan/Elohim/Calabim with Mardoc and Thoth
Posts: 2,788
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2009
(May 8th, 2013, 07:29)Ellimist Wrote: (May 8th, 2013, 00:43)NobleHelium Wrote: Spies don't get caught when you have OB. Does CFC even have Alphabet?
I was not aware of this. I don't use spies very often.
Azoth:
Just because we aren't planning to attack CFC doesn't mean there isn't value in making them wonder if we are. They would NAP-stab us over the sort of BS they just did, so they will be wondering if we would do the same. Especially given our history with Imperio in the previous game.
Why are we so eager to reassure these guys? How does that possibly benefit us in any way, now or ever? Even if you're right and we want a NAP renewal with them, we're more likely to get it if they perceive us as dangerous. If we make it abundantly clear, as we hae so far, that we would NEVER EVER EVER attack them, a NAP has zero value to them and they will continue openly doing things that jeopardize it.
It benefits us, because it means they won't buildup in reaction to a perceived threat from us. If they think that we are going to attack them, then they will buildup military in response. We don't want a neighbor building up military, especially considering we are planning to use ours on the exact opposite side of our empire shortly.
Posts: 6,731
Threads: 131
Joined: Mar 2004
(May 8th, 2013, 00:43)NobleHelium Wrote: Spies don't get caught when you have OB.
What? Yes they do. The chance is considerably lower, but they do.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=247719
May 8th, 2013, 09:07
(This post was last modified: May 8th, 2013, 09:07 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,300
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I really like that new ASM draft. I'm pretty sure I'll send it shortly, probably with the face like darrell suggested.
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
(May 8th, 2013, 08:36)T-hawk Wrote: (May 8th, 2013, 00:43)NobleHelium Wrote: Spies don't get caught when you have OB.
What? Yes they do. The chance is considerably lower, but they do.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=247719
Hmmmm... not sure how I remembered that incorrectly. And it's not a linear modifier which is annoying.
Posts: 2,995
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2012
I'm a bit sceptical about the "your friends" signature. Sounds to me very ironic, but following this discussion makes me biased..
Posts: 15,300
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I think the purpose of it is to be subtly sarcastic/ironic. Not nastily so, just enough.
Posts: 8,770
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
(May 8th, 2013, 09:36)scooter Wrote: I think the purpose of it is to be subtly sarcastic/ironic. Not nastily so, just enough.
That's certainly how I took it...its not like they haven't earned some subtle sarcasm .
Darrell
|