I was online at the same time when Serdoa was playing and I have some interesting observations.
1. I can confirm that Serdoa is the first in GNP, first in MFG, first in CY. Rival bests in this categories increased as he was settling a city and changing staff.
2. We are about equal with Serdoa in land area. We were second before he settled a city and has become third after that. The first one is SC and by a wide margin. Well, this gives some hope, actually.
What I deduce from those observations? Well, I'm inclined to blame the mapmker. I haven't seen Serdoa's start but he had two cities <i>and</i> Stonehendge well before T50. I'm pretty sure that his start was <i>somewhat</i> better than ours and that he started to snowball after that.
Of course, I've done my own mistakes. Choosing Elizabeth was the very first one. I now think that I should have taken Hannibal or Darius or Ragnar of Rome, should have played strategic defense against Egypt in first two cases and killed them off with praets in the third one. If Darius or Hannibal, I should be more active in settling the jungles and colonizing the land to the east. This is all hindsight, of course, but philosophical trait has no place in such a competetive game, as I now see. To leverage it fully one must sit in caste system; to allow yourself to sit in caste system early, you need to have secure borders; if you are playing in a really high-level MP, you can't count on secure borders. Hence, you shouldn't choose philosophical trait.
I have chosen wrongly and faced the following dilemma: I either should start a war with Egypt which was pretty risky one and relied on circumstances I couldn't control; or I should basically play without a trait. I started a war, wasn't able to achieve my goals and put myself behind. Together with evident map imbalance, this created current situation.
What I can now do? Not much. My plan is to finish off Egypt, beeline Astro/Rifling, find Serdoa and raze his core to dust. It would most probably give victory to Slowcheetah or Yuri but I don't care. I just don't like the fact that everyone, as it seems, thinks that Serdoa has won already.
Of course, it is possible that he will meet my redcoats with infantry...
1. I can confirm that Serdoa is the first in GNP, first in MFG, first in CY. Rival bests in this categories increased as he was settling a city and changing staff.
2. We are about equal with Serdoa in land area. We were second before he settled a city and has become third after that. The first one is SC and by a wide margin. Well, this gives some hope, actually.
What I deduce from those observations? Well, I'm inclined to blame the mapmker. I haven't seen Serdoa's start but he had two cities <i>and</i> Stonehendge well before T50. I'm pretty sure that his start was <i>somewhat</i> better than ours and that he started to snowball after that.
Of course, I've done my own mistakes. Choosing Elizabeth was the very first one. I now think that I should have taken Hannibal or Darius or Ragnar of Rome, should have played strategic defense against Egypt in first two cases and killed them off with praets in the third one. If Darius or Hannibal, I should be more active in settling the jungles and colonizing the land to the east. This is all hindsight, of course, but philosophical trait has no place in such a competetive game, as I now see. To leverage it fully one must sit in caste system; to allow yourself to sit in caste system early, you need to have secure borders; if you are playing in a really high-level MP, you can't count on secure borders. Hence, you shouldn't choose philosophical trait.
I have chosen wrongly and faced the following dilemma: I either should start a war with Egypt which was pretty risky one and relied on circumstances I couldn't control; or I should basically play without a trait. I started a war, wasn't able to achieve my goals and put myself behind. Together with evident map imbalance, this created current situation.
What I can now do? Not much. My plan is to finish off Egypt, beeline Astro/Rifling, find Serdoa and raze his core to dust. It would most probably give victory to Slowcheetah or Yuri but I don't care. I just don't like the fact that everyone, as it seems, thinks that Serdoa has won already.
Of course, it is possible that he will meet my redcoats with infantry...