December 18th, 2013, 11:03
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
This is well-done Seven and quite in line with what I'd like to see from a balance mod.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
December 18th, 2013, 11:09
Posts: 3,199
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2010
I forgot about this in the poll, but what do you think about the RBMod tile balance changes? E.g. making workshops and watermills interesting much earlier, and making mines not be eclipsed in the late game. It's one of my favourite parts of that mod, though I very much respect the philosophy that if something isn't breaking the game it doesn't need to be fixed.
December 18th, 2013, 16:10
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
(December 18th, 2013, 08:57)Commodore Wrote: A general note; I think you'll find Chm's strength rather dependent on the style of map; a torusworld or something else MP-custom happy-heavy will see it a bit weak, while a standard script will see it ridiculously strong. Not sure if that's fixable, though.
Torusland uses the exact same formula for number of luxury resources as the map scripts that come with the game. It is proportional to the number of players in the game with a bit of variance thrown in. For example, I just rolled a 2-player pangaea and a 2-player torusland map: they had 12 and 10 luxuries, respectively.
Of course, mapmakers can do whatever they want, and in the past that's often involved placing a lot of luxuries. (Compare 5-6 luxes per player with the e.g. 9 per player in pbem25, or the 16 per player from pbem29.) I think we've gotten better about that over time, though. There's also the aspect on blindly rolled maps where some people get a ton of luxes and others get next to none, but hopefully we aren't needing to balance traits around that kind of game!
(December 18th, 2013, 09:31)Sian Wrote: would it be possible to give Charismatic more free units (similar to Vassalage's free units)
That's possible. Another option I was considering, if the flat 3 happy doesn't work out well, would be adding 2 commerce to the palace for CHM leaders, as an early-game benefit that's different from most.
(December 18th, 2013, 11:03)Gaspar Wrote: This is well-done Seven and quite in line with what I'd like to see from a balance mod.
Thanks Gaspar.
(December 18th, 2013, 11:09)WilliamLP Wrote: I forgot about this in the poll, but what do you think about the RBMod tile balance changes? E.g. making workshops and watermills interesting much earlier, and making mines not be eclipsed in the late game. It's one of my favourite parts of that mod, though I very much respect the philosophy that if something isn't breaking the game it doesn't need to be fixed.
I would love to make changes to tile yields, but I'm restraining myself. I don't think it's needed. It probably won't happen.
December 18th, 2013, 17:01
Posts: 2,265
Threads: 54
Joined: Aug 2011
(December 18th, 2013, 16:10)SevenSpirits Wrote: (December 18th, 2013, 09:31)Sian Wrote: would it be possible to give Charismatic more free units (similar to Vassalage's free units)
That's possible. Another option I was considering, if the flat 3 happy doesn't work out well, would be adding 2 commerce to the palace for CHM leaders, as an early-game benefit that's different from most.
While sure it would be an early game benefit, i'm not to sure thats where its buff need to be, rather being in the midgame, where HR and spare hammers, to a certain degree would be able to help any decifits on the happiness econ ...
December 18th, 2013, 17:11
(This post was last modified: December 18th, 2013, 17:14 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,380
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
...Wouldn't giving a bonus on a per city improvement basis be the best solution to that, Sian?
EDIT: Just trying to interpret Sian's post, not suggesting changes or opinions...
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
December 18th, 2013, 17:31
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
I like Sian's idea, it's an interesting and useful bonus that fits the flavour of CHA perfectly.
I agree with not changing tile yields in general, but how about just one or two small changes to make underused options viable?
December 19th, 2013, 15:45
(This post was last modified: December 19th, 2013, 15:46 by Azoth.)
Posts: 872
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2007
(December 18th, 2013, 16:10)SevenSpirits Wrote: Another option I was considering, if the flat 3 happy doesn't work out well, would be adding 2 commerce to the palace for CHM leaders, as an early-game benefit that's different from most.
What about adding +1 or +2 happiness to the Palace instead? (On top of the per city bonus)
December 19th, 2013, 15:58
Posts: 2,265
Threads: 54
Joined: Aug 2011
you can only heap so much happy on the trait before its irrelevant ... and as mentioned, by the time HR is around its going to be effectively so as well
December 19th, 2013, 15:59
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
HR happiness isn't free.
I have to run.
December 19th, 2013, 16:14
(This post was last modified: December 19th, 2013, 16:15 by Sian.)
Posts: 2,265
Threads: 54
Joined: Aug 2011
never said it was ... but it certainly is close enough (specially if you happen to be able to keep hammering out warriors) that any flat +happy looses a bit of its luster ...
|