Posts: 10,102
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
I can't see anything better, so I'm happy with the novice lynch.
Try as I might, I just can't read your defence/attacks as villagery. I will say I think your point on jowy and questions is valid, and worth a response.
Could you post why you find me scummy? Aside from riding the novice wagon OC.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Official Vote Count
novice (6)- Qgqqqq, Lewwyn, pindicator, BRickAstley, Gazglum, Jkaen
BRickAstley (3) - novice, Mattimeo, zakalwe
zakalwe (2) - uberfish, Jowy
7 hours, 45 minutes to go
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,102
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
Do tell.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(June 28th, 2013, 05:07)Qgqqqqq Wrote: I can't see anything better, so I'm happy with the novice lynch.
Try as I might, I just can't read your defence/attacks as villagery. I will say I think your point on jowy and questions is valid, and worth a response.
Could you post why you find me scummy? Aside from riding the novice wagon OC.
Finding anything better than lynching me is pretty simple:
(June 28th, 2013, 04:02)novice Wrote: (June 27th, 2013, 20:13)Mattimeo Wrote: (June 27th, 2013, 12:47)BRickAstley Wrote: One of his first votes, after a vote on slow for 'dont vote people at start cause you always do'. The actual vote was earlier, but he gives a reason here that could be understandable for an early vote, but isn't very strong. It's not out of the realms of possibility that MJW had knowledge that pertained to sanity that could have been wolf-influenced. Well, in hindsight we know that he didn't have wolf-influenced knowledge of the sanity mechanic, but we *do* know that the person who initially introduced sanity to the discussion in a major way, and whose claims MJW was basing his entire argument on, was lying about those claims.
And then, this person ends the day with the final vote against MJW?
Quoted for emphasis. BRick was happy to let other players sweat for assumptions related to his own lies.
About suspecting you, ironically it's pretty much the same thing people are suspecting me for. Lurking, playing lazily, not making cases. You've already defended it here but I haven't really noticed an improvement after this. And as with Gazglum, other people have bubbled down the list.
(June 26th, 2013, 13:50)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Too the first two, 1. I've been really, really busy, and trying to avoid RB which is being a timesink (which is why I've delayed the DG). that has mostly been decided one way or the other, so I should have much more time in the next few days.
2. And yeah, as a result of the previous I haven't really been putting much effort into the game. The slow case seemed really good, people weren't arguing with me about it, and I just didn't feel the need to work any more what with everything else. Basically, I just took the chance to be a bit lazy 
I'm probably not helping myself by pointing out what's scummy about everybody else, since that's "casting around for alternate lynches", but whatever.
I have to run.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(June 28th, 2013, 04:29)Jowy Wrote: you know what, i think a lot of points you make are good zak. but i also cant trust your word. last day you got villager lynched with ur shady evidence. today u spend a lot of time doing smear campaign on me.
Like I have said over and over again, you are the one who is hurting your own credibility. I'm just trying to make you realize that lying or deliberately trolling us isn't the way to play.
You say I can't be trusted because I got a villager lynched, and because I held back information for half a day. I gave a good reason for why I did that, and holding back information for half a day is not the same as lying. I gave you all plenty of time to consider the information that I had and form your own opinion before deciding on a lynch. On the other hand, you say you're vanilla and don't have a post restriction, so logically you have to be outright lying, or you are just needlessly trolling us. That's not a good way to build trust. If I was leading a smear campaign on you, I would be talking about how your behavior is scummy. But I never said that. It's just intensely annoying and (if you really are innocent) misguided.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
ichabod was "trolly" too, yet he was villager as well. if you lynch because someone's style is annoying or trolly in ur mind, then ur not gonna win as villager. if my post style made my messages unreadable i would agree. but it does not. you understand everything, so no problem.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Well, so far I haven't said you're scummy, and I haven't voted for you. My only crime is to allow myself to be annoyed by someone who deliberately annoys me. It doesn't help that you've been voting for me without providing good reasons, and failed to answer the questions directed at you when those reasons were picked apart.
Maybe you should take a look in the mirror before you lecture others about their play style.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
i have provided reason and i try to ignore question that are already answered.
for example about 10 question about my post style, when i answer it day 1.
also you do same thing, except you ignore important question that help villager.
i ask for scum list, you ignore. i ask why u so desperate when ur not in danger, u ignore.
instead u keep posting about meaningless things like post style.
|
