Agreed, that all sounds really good, scooter.
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
I am always in favor of securing as much map information as possible. CFC has already scouted us out more or less completely, which means that our maps will be trickling around to everyone else eventually. We may as well try and get the low down on everyone else who's willing to trade in return.
Go ahead, scooter - I think your outline is quite good.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Quick and simple chat with Caledorn:
Chat with CFC Wrote:scooter: hey! long time no talk. We just got paper in the ISDG, you guys interested in a map swap?
Here is one single draft for CivFr and UniversCiv:
Map draft Wrote:CivFr, [or UniversCiv] If nobody objects, I'll send that in a bit to both of them.
Regarding the CP missionary: If they didn't care about keeping us happy and really wanted to spread the religion to us, they could easily have double-moved the missionary into our city and spread it before we could object or close borders. Instead they moved the missionary into our view at the start of the turn, leading to our reaction. The idea that they are now lying to us is therefore ludicrous to me.
It sure seems likely that the missionary is headed for the german city. It's possible they were planning to move through our territory, like we moved through theirs, in order to get there faster via roads and de-jungled tiles. From their message I take it that they aren't going to do that now, though. (And in any case, I think we'd actually be OK with them moving through there this one time, sort of as compensation for us breaking the agreement earlier.) We should clearly re-open borders with them. Edit: My personal preference would be to send a quick message back to civplayers saying they can send the missionary north through our lands if they like, as a kind gesture and to lessen their ability to hold our own minor breaches against us later. (April 25th, 2013, 15:47)SevenSpirits Wrote: We should clearly re-open borders with them. That sounds like a good idea.
I have to run.
Agree with Seven (sensible as usual) on CivPlayers, and the draft to CivFr and Univers looks good.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
(April 25th, 2013, 13:08)Bigger Wrote: thats not the only benefit of liberalism. its a prer-req for many important techs, and unlocks 2 civic choices that will surely end up using eventually with our cottage economy. Liberalism is the prereq for exactly one tech. Communism. Communism does not lead to any other techs.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. |