Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
It is very much a useless tech until we're actually ready to go for Communism. We're not going to be in Free Speech anytime soon.
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
Told ya we'd be conquering a Buddhist city anyway 
Posts: 15,319
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Sent to CivFr and UniversCiv (individually, so both were not on the greeting line)
RB Wrote:UniversCiv/CivFr,
Wanted to pop in and say hey and see how you guys are doing. We haven't really had many dealings so far given how far away from each other we are, but we were hoping we could start to change that as the world is beginning to feel "smaller" . Are you guys interested in a map trade for starters? We're both quite far from each other, so between the two of us, we could probably uncover most of the map. Let me know how that sounds!
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
Posts: 6,126
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2006
Quote:Scooter,
By the way. Do we need to discuss that NAP doesnt suppose gifting military units to third side who is at war or going to start war with the other?
Civplayers
OT4E
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
I'm not sure I understand what he is saying. I think he is fishing for information to see if we're about to go on the attack but I'm not sure. In any case I don't see the missionary as a military gift, if he's talking about sending that to the Germans and is inferring an attack from us against the Germans. Maybe the reply from us should just ask what he is talking about, unless anyone else has a better idea what he is saying here.
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
He's just asking for clarification that a NAP includes no proxy warring. Since we apparently didn't trust him to stick to the spirit of our agreement.
We should just answer that yeah, we consider proxy warring (elaborate on what that means) to be prohibited by a NAP, and thank him for sharing our understanding.
I have to run.
Posts: 614
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2005
What if CIVPlayers are planning to declare on Germans? Can they make progress against German team? It would be bad, if Aployton also gets involved...
Mwin
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
then its a 4 way race, I guess. we'll get our part and then turn on WPC if we don't get a big enough piece.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 246
Joined: Aug 2004
Given the NAP lovefest that seems to exist between pretty much everyone in this game, I find the notion of a four-way invasion of the Germans to be pretty slim.
April 26th, 2013, 10:55
(This post was last modified: April 26th, 2013, 10:56 by kjn.)
Posts: 4,090
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008
Well, they can, but the only German city CivPlayers can reach easily is Wolfratshausen - every other German city is a long way away from them.
Then there is the question of units. CivPlayers have some strong military techs, like HBR, but I doubt they can get a crushing military advantage before we can start our war. They also don't have a strong quantitative advantage (in lots of population and numbers of cities) that they can use either.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
|
