Posts: 15,300
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
From CFC:
CFC Wrote:Scooter/RB,
Thank you for your offer to trade world maps. We currently have explored the lands we need, so we are not interested in a map trade at this point.
Caledorn, on behalf of Team CFC
Translation: WFYABTA (and possibly they are bound to a deal with Apolyton)
Posts: 15,300
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Sent to WPC:
RB Wrote:Tatu,
We have paper now - do you guys want to exchange maps? We've got a bunch of map info on the German team, so I think between the two of us we will have the bulk of their land mapped out.
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
Sent to Spanish Team:
RB Wrote:Hey guys! Would you guys like to trade maps with us? We have extensive map knowledge on CFC as well as a couple other neighbors.
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
Sent to CivPlayers to confirm that our NAP isn't just war-related.
RB Wrote:OT4E,
Oh we have been assuming that is the case, so we are in agreement. Definitely no 3rd party gifting or any dirty tricks is included as part of the NAP. Glad you agree!
Thanks,
scooter - Team RB
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
Received from CivPlayers:
Quote:Thank you,
Our position is that we dont try to get very long deals, but those we have are interesting for both sides and never becomes a burden.
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From WePlayCiv:
Quote:Scooter,
Yes, we agree.
Lets exchange maps.
Also, Beta will draw up some tactical suggestions for our attack.
I'll tell you about it when they're ready.
Best regards,
Tatu of WPC
Posts: 6,126
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2006
Spanish Apolyton Wrote:yea! we love maps, we love our neighbors.. we love all of you guys!
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From CivFr:
Quote:Dear Egyptians,
Unfortunately, we haven't any interest to share the map with your nation as our knowledge of the world is enough for us.
Best regards,
Mayans
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From Apolyton:
Quote:Greetings,
We would like to discuss a few things.
First, our NAP is closing to it's end. Since we see many of your units visiting our land novadays We would like to discuss the first extension of this treaty from t150 to t170.
Second, Your warchariot has surely noticed that there is a rebel village in the northern tundra. Our forces are in position to take it by force if necessary, but we still hope peacefull negotiations will result in this splinter colony joining back to our empire(( or we just wait until it grows to pop2.. )). We would like to ask you to not interfere there in any way. In fact we would like you to avoid moving toward that city any closer. We would like to get your word for it that you will not attack there. Otherwise we will be foced to take it ourselves, acting sooner as we intended and it will have bad impacts on our diplomatic relations. We hope it will not come to that.
regards,
MZ
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From UniversCiv:
Quote:Hi,
OK, lets trade maps
Yuufo / UniversCiv
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From CFC:
Quote:Hi Scooter
As you might have noticed, the Spaniards have finally agreed to peace and we were able to connect our marble! We would like to gift it to you now as per our agreement. We currently don't need it but we would like to start on our own Epics in about ten turns. We have offered it in game so please ask your turnplayer to accept it.
Thanks,
Caledorn / Team CFC
Posts: 4,090
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008
Sent to Apolyton (though it seems the draft was missing the standard closing signature, so wasn't included).
Quote:MZ,
For starters, you have our word that our War Chariot will not interfere with you in any way. So no worries!
We are also interested in extending the NAP. Do you guys have anything against a longer NAP? We were thinking even longer might be nice - maybe T185? Any thoughts on that?
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
|