Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
I like banter and I don't do diplo. I don't mind spies being used to scout, though I hate their stupid implementation of disappearing on random chances.
I like both pick draft or random from pruned list.
Only scout start seems nice. Random warriors choke aren't fun.
Posts: 1,801
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2013
Seven, wouldn't banning peace treaty's in an AI-diplo game prevent concessions for peace? Seems like a pretty important part of the game.
Posts: 23,419
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
I think that's the point.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
Posts: 1,801
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2013
Ah, I missed his explanation post. I think it would be interesting to test a game like that to see if his theory has any credence.
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
OK, 3 people voted for complete spy ban. (I'll never see them be used for anything cool!  ) Usually when people ban spies they also ban using great spies for scouting and EP bombing, should I take it that this is the case here too?
Drafting from a pruned list seems to be about as popular as something can be when everyone is so easygoing, so how about we go with that. My suggestion is we ask for lurkers to provide us with 10 leader/civ pairs as though they were doing their "randomize, then pick a reasonably fair set of them" plan to assign combos for a 10-player game. Then we draft from those in reverse turn order. Any objections?
Everything else I mentioned in my last post seems to be not-objected-to. Did I forget anything?
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Blockades? I don't mind them though.
GSpy: Only settling or GA, no scouting or bombing.
No objections to your idea to draft from the lurker list.
Posts: 6,075
Threads: 36
Joined: Jul 2010
(May 19th, 2013, 00:57)Serdoa Wrote: Blockades? I don't mind them though.
I don't like them much. I'm voting for a ban. 
Quote:GSpy: Only settling or GA, no scouting or bombing.
I'm ok with this (assuming "settling" includes building Scotland Yard  ), but I'd also be ok with allowing GSpys to scout.
Quote:No objections to your idea to draft from the lurker list.
Looks like the lurkers better get busy and draw up a list for us. 
fnord
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
I vote for G Spy to be settled or used for golden age. I vote to ban blockades.
Posts: 4,831
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2010
(May 19th, 2013, 09:21)Thoth Wrote: Looks like the lurkers better get busy and draw up a list for us.
As soon as you blokes create a PBEM 50(!) subforum, I'm sure the lurkers will be on it.
Do y'all have a mapmaker yet?
Posts: 23,419
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Oh it's 50? Then I have to say, if Seven and Ichabod are OK with it, I'd appreciate if I could be the 6th player.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
|
