Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
Proposed Draft to CFC Wrote:Hi Sommer, Preview Edit: several x-posts Played: Pitboss 18 - Kublai Khan of Germany Somalia | Pitboss 11 - De Gaulle of Byzantium | Pitboss 8 - Churchill of Portugal | PB7 - Mao of Native America | PBEM29 Greens - Mao of Babylon (May 30th, 2013, 16:06)scooter Wrote: In-game info request: Can I get a full list of all active deals GWT has with other teams? OB, resource deals, etc. I'm wondering if we can lean on a few teams to cut off their deals with GWT, so if I could look at a list, I think we could get a pretty good idea of who might be willing. Heh. Good thing I decided to check here before I logged out. GWT's deals: Gems, spices from us Marble to us OB with us, Spanish Apolyton, Apolyton, CivPlayers, CFC, Univers
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Great work diplomatically. Now we know for sure that CFC is declaring war on Turn 175, and that they've realized their mistake in signing that earlier 75 turn NAP. With dozens of turns to prepare, we should be able to minimize the damage. As others have said, the real grunt work will be done in diplomacy with other teams. At the moment, it looks roughly like this:
Realms Beyond + WPC + Spanish CFC + Germans + Apolyton (?) And we have no real idea what CivFr, UniversCiv, or CivPlayers are doing. Honestly, this really comes down to a successful war against the Germans. If we take them out, it will be very difficult for other teams to defeat us, barring some kind of crazy 5 vs 1 alliance or whatever (which is on the table too!) If we stall out against the Germans and are still deep in their territory on T175, we're going to be in real trouble. Just have to win and win fast. CFC Wrote:Hi Scooter, Good luck, and don't trip over the elephants! Thxby, Realms Beyond
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
(May 30th, 2013, 17:02)Sullla Wrote: Great work diplomatically. Now we know for sure that CFC is declaring war on Turn 175, and that they've realized their mistake in signing that earlier 75 turn NAP. With dozens of turns to prepare, we should be able to minimize the damage. As others have said, the real grunt work will be done in diplomacy with other teams. At the moment, it looks roughly like this: If we should somehow find ourselves mired in German territory, we can always appeal to their sense of self-preservation and call a halt to our advance to cover ourselves for a T175 attack by CFC et al, then come back and finish the rump state carcass of Germany later when it is more convenient. --- lol @ Xenu. Your smarm knows no bounds.
And if they complain about our trading elephants to the Spanish team, then I think we can reply with that they're currently using our stone as a future happy resource, since they're building the Notre Dame. We estimate that they could finish the wonder at least 8t earlier thanks to our stone, and as such they owe us 8*2*15g or 240g for this.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
I think our top priority should be to make some sort of agreement with CivPlayers. Even having them neutral will be fine if we can't form an alliance, but ideally we'll want to point them towards Apolyton while we shift focus to CFC.
The same goes for CivFr. If we can get both them and CivPlayers to attack Apolyton, that should win us the game. Against CFC, we may want to consider keeping up good relations with WPC to persuade them into declaring alongside us. They probably won't accomplish much against CFC, but if they can be enough of a nuisance it'll probably draw some units away from us. The Spanish should be easily won over as well, if they are still around in 25 turns. I have no idea what to do with UniversCiv. In all likelihood, they'll remain neutral and just watch the world go up in flames from the sidelines. I would recommend keeping a scouting unit or two in CFC's territory to monitor what their forces are doing (and relay that info to the Spanish) as long as we have open borders. It's unlikely that they would NAP-stab us, but I'd rather not take any chances.
We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw
(May 30th, 2013, 17:02)Sullla Wrote: Great work diplomatically. Now we know for sure that CFC is declaring war on Turn 175, and that they've realized their mistake in signing that earlier 75 turn NAP. I don't agree that it was a mistake for them. It would have been a mistake for them to go to war before now. Instead they expanded, built pyramids, and teched up to the era where dogpiles can actually work. (May 30th, 2013, 17:19)kjn Wrote: And if they complain about our trading elephants to the Spanish team, then I think we can reply with that they're currently using our stone as a future happy resource, since they're building the Notre Dame. We estimate that they could finish the wonder at least 8t earlier thanks to our stone, and as such they owe us 8*2*15g or 240g for this.
Civilization IV: 21 (Bismarck of Mali), 29 (Mao Zedong of Babylon), 38 (Isabella of China), 45 (Victoria of Sumeria), PB12 (Darius of Sumeria), 56 (Hammurabi of Sumeria), PB16 (Bismarck of Mali), 78 (Augustus of Byzantium), PB56 (Willem of China)
Hearthstone: ArenaDrafts Profile No longer playing Hearthstone. |
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |