I would suggest sending this to suttree:
Thank you for the comprehensive explanation about the details of an espionage economy, that is useful information. We are interested in entering such an agreement, but at the same time we are also somewhat concerning about your potential to be a runaway. We will not in any way break our NAP with you, but we also hesitate to help you build a further lead over everyone else. The way we see it, we are all in it to win and not settle for second place. Given that you're the clear game leader, that means we're going to be a little bit harder to haggle with. Catwalk advises me that he once lost a game where he was allied to the game leader, and there's a risk of the same thing happening here. That said, we are interested in mutual cooperation if the benefits to us are big enough. We are interested in buying techs from you for 30% of the raw cost minus the EP cost. This will still help you build a lead (you pay nothing for this arrangement), and we will have some chance of keeping pace with you rather than invetiably falling behind your impressive economy.
As for DMOC, maybe this:
We share your concerns about the runaways. We are not at liberty to say much, but we are very interested in mutual cooperation that gives us both a chance at winning rather than handing them the victory already.
Feel free to revise as much as you want to, or go with something completely different.
Thank you for the comprehensive explanation about the details of an espionage economy, that is useful information. We are interested in entering such an agreement, but at the same time we are also somewhat concerning about your potential to be a runaway. We will not in any way break our NAP with you, but we also hesitate to help you build a further lead over everyone else. The way we see it, we are all in it to win and not settle for second place. Given that you're the clear game leader, that means we're going to be a little bit harder to haggle with. Catwalk advises me that he once lost a game where he was allied to the game leader, and there's a risk of the same thing happening here. That said, we are interested in mutual cooperation if the benefits to us are big enough. We are interested in buying techs from you for 30% of the raw cost minus the EP cost. This will still help you build a lead (you pay nothing for this arrangement), and we will have some chance of keeping pace with you rather than invetiably falling behind your impressive economy.
As for DMOC, maybe this:
We share your concerns about the runaways. We are not at liberty to say much, but we are very interested in mutual cooperation that gives us both a chance at winning rather than handing them the victory already.
Feel free to revise as much as you want to, or go with something completely different.