November 30th, 2014, 17:11
Posts: 23,441
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Looking at the infractions I've gained on my CFC account going through My Account...wow.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
November 30th, 2014, 17:13
(This post was last modified: November 30th, 2014, 17:14 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,441
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
(November 30th, 2014, 17:07)2metraninja Wrote: I think this was Krill and not Mackoti. At least I never heard of Mack such thing.
I refused to play because of it. mack agreed with what I said. I still hold that my position was right.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
November 30th, 2014, 17:16
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
I think the best ISDG choice by far was not playing at all. So Krill knocked that one out of the park IMO.
November 30th, 2014, 17:18
(This post was last modified: November 30th, 2014, 17:19 by 2metraninja.)
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 11
Joined: Feb 2012
(November 30th, 2014, 17:11)Krill Wrote: Looking at the infractions I've gained on my CFC account going through My Account...wow. What are those infractions? I think I never saw one.
(November 30th, 2014, 17:13)Krill Wrote: (November 30th, 2014, 17:07)2metraninja Wrote: I think this was Krill and not Mackoti. At least I never heard of Mack such thing.
I refused to play because of it. mack agreed with what I said. I still hold that my position was right. Well, we at CFC required team leader approval before joining the team too, so no, for those who think this was the case, it is continuation of the thoughts line of avoiding having thoughts.
November 30th, 2014, 17:32
Posts: 23,441
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
The problem is not having a closed forum, so google bots and other teams can't enter. The problem is when a team refuses to allow new people to join them.
The infractions are old from 2009 and 2010, in the SANCTA game. CFC mods have sticks up their arses IMO.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
November 30th, 2014, 17:32
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
Actualy i didnt wanna play cause the new players were refused to join becasue they might be spies form another sites(I think there refered to CFC after reading therads), and from there i seen there 'superiority' so i decided i dont wana play in a such team .
November 30th, 2014, 17:42
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 11
Joined: Feb 2012
(November 30th, 2014, 17:32)Krill Wrote: The problem is not having a closed forum, so google bots and other teams can't enter. The problem is when a team refuses to allow new people to join them. Which played quite nice for me actually. Yossa was a true gem RB threw in the mud for me to pick up
November 30th, 2014, 18:21
Posts: 4,753
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2006
Okay then,
I think it depends if CFC would have been able to sign peace with CivFr without Mackoti's help. If they can than RB probably loses anyway. If not CFC would not give gold to CivPlayers and Apolyton will at war with CivFr. This would probably make RB/Sullla not give up and find a way to kill the main stack. And with the nasty SoZ and great wall combo they would force peace and then waltz to victory like in the first game.
As much as I like the irony of RB's attitude making mackoti join CFC and cause their downfall it doesn't change the fact that mackoti played for the wrong team. It kinda destroyed the purpose of this game as a contest between websites. If this was a real game mackoti would be forced to play for RB or sit.
I think your reasoning for RB being bad for not allowing people with no/little posts to sign up is incorrect, Krill. People cheated in the past and got caught red-handed. RB is not treating other players as dishonest rather they could be dishonest and I feel you cannot argue with that. They even got away with it like GCA and SANTCA which makes it even worse. Just because the mod wasn't willing to accuse a team without direct evidence doesn't take away that GCA and SANTCA cheated. The combat results were impossible so you don't need anything else. I call Memphis a cheater and would be willing to go to court. I don't think RB blocking people does anything useful as if you are willing to put a spy their your willing to use a fog-of-war hack which is much worse. So if you block people and take it to the logical conclusion you just have to not play at all.
November 30th, 2014, 18:25
(This post was last modified: November 30th, 2014, 18:26 by Krill.)
Posts: 23,441
Threads: 132
Joined: Jun 2009
Quote:I think your reasoning for RB being bad for not allowing people with no/little posts to sign up is incorrect, Krill. People cheated in the past and got caught red-handed. RB is not treating other players as dishonest rather they could be dishonest and I feel you cannot argue with that. They even got away with it like GCA and SANTCA which makes it even worse. Just because the mod wasn't willing to accuse a team without direct evidence doesn't take away that GCA and SANTCA cheated. The combat results were impossible so you don't need anything else. I call Memphis a cheater and would be willing to go to court. smile I don't think RB blocking people does anything useful as if you are willing to put a spy their your willing to use a fog-of-war hack which is much worse. So if you block people and take it to the logical conclusion you just have to not play at all.
I wasn't going to reply to this, but let me get one thing straight with you. SANCTA did not cheat, and you are a lying piece of shit for saying that we did.
Current games (All): RtR: PB80 Civ 6: PBEM23
Ended games (Selection): BTS games: PB1, PB3, PBEM2, PBEM4, PBEM5B, PBEM50. RB mod games: PB5, PB15, PB27, PB37, PB42, PB46, PB71. FFH games: PBEMVII, PBEMXII. Civ 6: PBEM22 Games ded lurked: PB18
November 30th, 2014, 19:29
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 11
Joined: Feb 2012
MJW, do we know each-other from somewhere? I had played at Apolyton (you seems to be member of Team Apolyton) and I had played at CFC and it looks you played there too, but I never heard your nick before.
(November 30th, 2014, 18:21)MJW (ya that one) Wrote: Okay then,
I think it depends if CFC would have been able to sign peace with CivFr without Mackoti's help. If they can than RB probably loses anyway. If not CFC would not give gold to CivPlayers and Apolyton will at war with CivFr. This would probably make RB/Sullla not give up and find a way to kill the main stack. And with the nasty SoZ and great wall combo they would force peace and then waltz to victory like in the first game.
I think quite a lot of facts are missing or messed up in your knowledge. It was Mack who persuaded me to declare war to CivFR in the first place, saying they will bend easily, which they did not, but this was the start of their downfall, having spending their MoM powered GAs to tech towards military techs and only gather money to upgrade units to be able to hold our attack. Ever since we declared them a war they were no longer a world power to be considered. Going back in memories I almost got discharged for jumping the gun and declaring war to CivFR without a vote.
Mack was the one who was advocating signing NAP with RB and finishing off CivFR with our 100+ shiny new war toys units.
At no point CP or Apolyton really wanted to go to war with CivFr, despite we were trying to use quite a pressure on them about this. We never got CP and Poly to not even sign NAPs with CivFr, they extended their NAPs despite I told them not to do so with the threat CFC wont help them against RB.
Signing peace with CivFR I believe was a result of a diplomatic effort through CP which was our allies back then and CP had some influence on CivFR imho as we were using them as peace negotiator.
It was way way later when we gave money to CP and Poly - RB was already dead.
(November 30th, 2014, 18:21)MJW (ya that one) Wrote: As much as I like the irony of RB's attitude making mackoti join CFC and cause their downfall it doesn't change the fact that mackoti played for the wrong team. It kinda destroyed the purpose of this game as a contest between websites. If this was a real game mackoti would be forced to play for RB or sit. Oh, the irony, you keep that line of thoughts. Well, I said enough, who have ears, heard. Mack can speak on his behalf and address this if he so desires.
|