Kristian95 Wrote:I can understand Sullla's gripe with what looks like a couple of teams not caring much about the NAPs they have signed.... in that aspect, if you sign NAPs and discard them at your leisure, that isn't all that honorable
Depends on technicalities, if you will. You are civ A, have an NAP with civ B, which is at war with civ C. You gift units to civ C. Is that breaking the NAP? Is gifting gold to civ C to upgrade units? Is giving them OB so they make more commerce breaking the NAP? And in another game, is trading them tech OK? Gifting? Trading resources?
It isn't a black and white issue. FWIW, I don't like blanket NAPs, because everyone views them differently. Perhaps the best way of considering them is a mutual agreement that neither side is going to attack the other within their own territory ie, attack them in a colonial fashion.
I also think Sullla is being naive in his thoughts on the matter, Whosit just gave him one very big and important piece of info, that screwing with Namoc is not in his interests.
I'm pretty sure he should have found some reason to be indignant no matter what happened.