The really bad thing™ is that Jabah posted that this broke the rules back on the 29th, but Speaker or Sullla didn't post anything publicly, or admit to it, until I asked for a reload.
Now, I hope that this happened because Speaker didn't check the forum, but that doesn't make it right. Two whole turns got played after they knew they had broken the rules, without trying to put it right until they got called on it. How is that...decent? Right? Just?
What India did was let Dantski move first (fine) then India attacked Goa (fine) then Dantski moved again to take out red lined defenders (NOT FINE) then India attacked a cannon stack with cav (NOT FINE).
You think that is just petty rules lawyering? After the rule specifically states that this is an illegal move, and India gained a massive advantage from flaunting it?
Now, I hope that this happened because Speaker didn't check the forum, but that doesn't make it right. Two whole turns got played after they knew they had broken the rules, without trying to put it right until they got called on it. How is that...decent? Right? Just?
What India did was let Dantski move first (fine) then India attacked Goa (fine) then Dantski moved again to take out red lined defenders (NOT FINE) then India attacked a cannon stack with cav (NOT FINE).
You think that is just petty rules lawyering? After the rule specifically states that this is an illegal move, and India gained a massive advantage from flaunting it?