RBP2 Lurker Discussion Thread - No Players!

[MJW (ya that one)]

Would it be okay to post in a spoiler thread that people in this lurker thread think that the new Inca turn-player, Slaze, is a good player in a spoiler thread?

[Rowain]

No it won't be ok. They might think that the lurkkers derive their opinion by watching slaze's turns.

[MJW (ya that one)]

No it won't be ok. They might think that the lurkkers derive their opinion by watching slaze's turns.

What if I say he just has a history of being good (in other games)?

[Rowain]

What if I say he just has a history of being good (in other games)?

Why do you want to discuss slaze and his qualities with an opponent of him?

Edit for clarification: If a player brings the subject 'Slaze' up by himself discuss what you want but don't push the player toward it

[WilliamLP]

I think, in the back of his mind, Whosit made that error on purpose in order to not waste 8 Pats.

That's the first I've ever heard of a Freudian mouse-slip.

[antisocialmunky]

He should swing south and Murder Dantski for Great Justice.

[T-hawk]

Of course, we won't be sending that off until after they finish their half of the current turn.

We've had some other teams complain about the timing and turnarounds of diplomacy with Sullla. They correctly take that as another factor towards seeming insincere and crafted, yet Sullla has no idea that he's coming across that way.

[Rowain]

We've had some other teams complain about the timing and turnarounds of diplomacy with Sullla. They correctly take that as another factor towards seeming insincere and crafted, yet Sullla has no idea that he's coming across that way.

And if ever he gets dogpiled again he will whine again about it being stupid and only his name/fame causing it.

[Kristian95]

to be fair to Spullla I think any team / person would be quite upset to be at the wrong end of a 5:1 dogpile. Having said that, I have a feeling that Sullla doesn't see anything wrong with his messages and therefore doesn't get that point.... also, I definitely understand Spullla if they are going to take advantage of the turn split at the moment, I think it is only understandable that they want to get a bit of that dish best served cold.... revenge.

[Adlain]

We've had some other teams complain about the timing and turnarounds of diplomacy with Sullla. They correctly take that as another factor towards seeming insincere and crafted, yet Sullla has no idea that he's coming across that way.

The turn around speed is spullla's fault, however you could argue that they are timing their deplomacy in their turn as they are counting it in the same as moving their units, invisable diplomats as aposed to warriors.