We Need a Jagiellon! - A Crusader Kings 3 Story

[pindicator]

Well, turns out I can. Loading the save shows full garrisons in counties.

Perhaps I should leave this to the masses then: do I keep going under the old patch and have the same AI issues, or do I start a new ruler/location/goal and use the new patch?

[Krill]

I want whatever gives me content to read...So what keeps you engaged the longest?

[Commodore]

Well, turns out I can.  Loading the save shows full garrisons in counties.

Perhaps I should leave this to the masses then:  do I keep going under the old patch and have the same AI issues, or do I start a new ruler/location/goal and use the new patch?

Best of all worlds: Fight wars with the improved AI, quickly flip to the old patch for sieges, then flip back after. Simple. 

[Amicalola]

RIP Ringaudas. At least you tried damn hard.

I want whatever gives me content to read...So what keeps you engaged the longest?

Mostly this.  

But what is the AI issue that the patch fixes (for a new game?). Is it the splitting stacks thing, or something different?

[Cyneheard]

Well, turns out I can.  Loading the save shows full garrisons in counties.

Perhaps I should leave this to the masses then:  do I keep going under the old patch and have the same AI issues, or do I start a new ruler/location/goal and use the new patch?

Best of all worlds: Fight wars with the improved AI, quickly flip to the old patch for sieges, then flip back after. Simple. 

Clearly you haven't dealt with Paradox patch issues before if you think that has a prayer of working. 

[Commodore]

Well, turns out I can.  Loading the save shows full garrisons in counties.

Perhaps I should leave this to the masses then:  do I keep going under the old patch and have the same AI issues, or do I start a new ruler/location/goal and use the new patch?

Best of all worlds: Fight wars with the improved AI, quickly flip to the old patch for sieges, then flip back after. Simple. 

Clearly you haven't dealt with Paradox patch issues before if you think that has a prayer of working. 

Oh, I have, which is why I suggested it. 

[pindicator]

I think I am a little too eager to have the AI improvements and mess around with all the new stuff. So I will start a new game.

Right now I'm leaning towards playing this guy:




Although I might still talk myself into doing the 867AD start, so I don't have scary Seljuks to my north

[Mjmd]

Although I might still talk myself into doing the 867AD start, so I don't have scary Seljuks to my north

Trait: coward  

jk, agreed with whatever you'll have fun with and write about, because I've been loving

[Miguelito]

Should the game not be recoverable when they patch the patch?

[pindicator]

Should the game not be recoverable when they patch the patch?

It varies.  But lately when they have a patch that will break the game they do a good job of communicating it ahead of time so people know they should finish their current game up.  In this patch they were saying that they didn't think it would break anything, and it appears that this Garrison issue was just something they missed in testing.  Probably related to the new 'dynamic garrisons' feature that they added to the patch.  (Garrisons would just instantly recover after a siege was won before; now they grow by a certain number of troops every month.)